Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B727 flap use above FL200

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B727 flap use above FL200

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jan 2022, 20:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Hi Bergerie1, I think he said it was to get a better rate of climb when speed restricted on departure. It was over 30 years ago that I flew with him so I may be wrong as to the reason.
dixi188 is online now  
Old 1st Feb 2022, 00:12
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Under the sea
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI...

* This is taken from the Boeing Airliner magazine:

“Several operators have asked Boeing why the Airplane Flight Manual has

a limitation restricting the use of flaps above 20,000 feet. The reason for the

limitation is simple; Boeing does not demonstrate or test (and therefore

does not certify) airplanes for operations with flaps extended above 20,000

feet.

There is no Boeing procedure that requires the use of flaps above 20,000

feet. Since flaps are intended to be used during the takeoff and

approach/land phases of flight, and since Boeing is not aware of any

airports where operation would require the use of flaps above 20,000 feet,

there is no need to certify the airplane in this configuration.”
extreme P is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2022, 16:17
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 567
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by dixi188
I used to fly with an ex BOAC VC10 captain who said there was a trick to improve the climb by splitting the flap/slat lever and doing something to either flaps or slats. When the Trident crashed at Staines the practice stopped overnight.
DIXI I would presume that you heard of the analogy of a flight engineer and a coachman; also that 90 % of pilots are above average and mine that a far greater percent in management are above average.
On my short stint on the VC10 I came cross one captain who knew more about vertical currents in rocket clouds than PF which resulted in a heavy turbulence check and several serious injuries and another who decided a visit to the airport chapel and a copious amount of prayers would ensure our flight safety which seemed to work although his wife made him live in the garage.
As Bergerie writes we are not test pilots although I have witnessed those in the office that think that it doesn’t apply to them as do their own procedures or the law.
My first lot decided to amend the design philosophies and the test pilots recommendation which left a smoking hole in a field.
There was an infamous DC 8 accident where the captain changed the air brake / lift dumper procedures which had them manually selected on short final, a heavy landing, go around and the wing folding downwind. I had a DC9 51 captain who would regularly stop auto lift dumper deployment on landing and another operate above MMO.
In theory flap selection makes a difference but from one post flying heavy metal with at least 5,000 hours and double that number take offs and mostly successful landings I have played around with stuff that test pilots supposedly do including the modification of aerofoils, control systems and C of G limits to enhance performance. Sometimes I’ve been successful, but it’s been my neck on the line and it’s after a lot of informed reading and discussion.
Enjoy retirement; it was a shame that they did way with your position as it was always a pleasure to fly with an engineer.
blind pew is online now  
Old 1st Feb 2022, 18:11
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,805
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What this man ⬆ said, totally. It happens most when people fly one aircraft type for years and years, forget how to fly aeroplanes generally, and get wrapped up in the minutae.
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2022, 18:47
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 567
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
????
Flew 6 types of Jets over 22 years at the same time a few light aircraft and some instructing, followed by ten years of varied gliders, motor gliders, microlights and class A overlapping with 22 years of Paragliders. (30 years of model aircraft concurrently).
The type of flying involving extremely close to terrain with experimental aircraft in marginal conditions lends itself to 110% understanding of the limitations of both machine and man.
As to forgetting how to fly aeroplanes generally..they go where you point them and just in case I ordered a new reserve parachute Sunday.
blind pew is online now  
Old 1st Feb 2022, 19:48
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,805
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wasn't clear, I was agreeing completely with what you said
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2022, 20:57
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,797
Received 119 Likes on 58 Posts
In the incident the flaps were never extended. The investigation came up with a silly scenario to explain the departure of the leading edge device because Boeing insisted that the leading edge actuator could never fail. But it was later shown it could fail - and the twisted logic scenario the FAA proposed could never happen.

Every pilot knows that the flaps increase drag. It was shown that "popping" the flaps as propsed indeed increased drag and that anyone who actually tried it in real life would experience greatly decereased performance - as you would expect. The idea that Boeing designed a wing so badly that a pilot "popping" the flaps out would improve performance is laughable - except to the idiots at the FAA.

The Captain who recovered the jet upset after the actuator failure, who should have been hailed as a hero, was pilloried by the investigation for nothing.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2022, 21:30
  #28 (permalink)  
V_2
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Checkboard
The Captain who recovered the jet upset after the actuator failure, who should have been hailed as a hero, was pilloried by the investigation for nothing.
Maybe, but the crew deleted all the cockpit voice recorder data because…?
V_2 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 05:59
  #29 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Maybe, but the crew deleted all the cockpit voice recorder data because…?

.. because that has been standard Industrial pilot practice for donkeys' years. I would have been astounded had they NOT wiped the record !

(Caveat - I am a bit removed from practical pulling and pushing these days so my comments may only apply to days of yore ? Certainly, in my airline days it was a pretty standard process as the intention was that the CVR only be read in the event of dead pilots. Many crews made it a routine practice to wipe the CVR at the end of every sector. As you might be aware, not all airline management groups are of high moral integrity seeking only the truth of any matter. The only instances I can recall where this was not the practice was where the captain saw fit to use the CVR as evidence for some problem or another and required the unit to be pulled post flight.)
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 06:58
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 567
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Apologies Alex.
John I would add wrt cvr that I and another co pilot were set up by a captain on descent into home base with some derogatory comment about a manager and then left the flight deck. We weren’t stupid and communicated by sign and mouthing. On stand I wiped the CVR and was faced with a tirade from said captain.
blind pew is online now  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 07:05
  #31 (permalink)  
V_2
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by john_tullamarine
The only instances I can recall where this was not the practice was where the captain saw fit to use the CVR as evidence for some problem or another and required the unit to be pulled post flight.)
Ok thanks for the insight. perhaps a shame for his own defence, that the Captain/crew decided that losing control and flying inverted wasn’t worthy of being one of those instances.
V_2 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 10:21
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Blind Pew, many thanks.
As to the F/E and Coachman, I couldn't possibly comment!
Had one captain on the Electra that thought he should sit in the middle seat as it was a bit higher than the pilot seats and had a better view. He also thought I should be down below stoking.
I'm enjoying retirement.
Dixi
dixi188 is online now  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 10:37
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 567
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
DIXI;
Instructed for a mate at Blackbushe on the Condor who went on to drive the Electra…AA.
He raved about it having grown up - if he ever did - on Shackletons.
Wasn’t it one of those that did a touch and go at Shannon without the wheels?
There was a short lived movement to do similar on the Trident with the captain on the middle seat supposedly as the Russkies did at the time.
blind pew is online now  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 11:49
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Aust
Posts: 399
Received 30 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by V_2
Ok thanks for the insight. perhaps a shame for his own defence, that the Captain/crew decided that losing control and flying inverted wasn’t worthy of being one of those instances.
Never likely to aid a defence when the crew can provide all information thats needed.
deja vu is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 17:28
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by blind pew
DIXI;
Instructed for a mate at Blackbushe on the Condor who went on to drive the Electra…AA.
He raved about it having grown up - if he ever did - on Shackletons.
Wasn’t it one of those that did a touch and go at Shannon without the wheels?
There was a short lived movement to do similar on the Trident with the captain on the middle seat supposedly as the Russkies did at the time.
N285F at Shannon operated by Renown Aviation in Channel Express colours (wet lease). 1 March 1999.
I flew on that aircraft during my training with Zantop.

https://aviation-safety.net/database...?id=19990301-0
Dixi.
dixi188 is online now  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 18:24
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 567
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
They did well to get it back on the ground…remember flying an aircraft that required cancelling the gear horn every time you closed the throttles…iirc Douglas; not unlike the Trident in early days where the droop micro switches were badly adjusted…select them in, cancel the amber attention getters automatically.
blind pew is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.