787 Dreamliner cockpit noise and windshield wipers
Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 137
From: USA
787 Dreamliner cockpit noise and windshield wipers
Hi,
I was recently in the Jumpseat of a 777, and one of the pilots said the cockpit of the 787 is so quiet because the wipers are stored vertically.
I’d have thought it has more to do with the design of the nose and the fixed windows.
Can anyone point to an authoritative source on the matter?
Thanks
I was recently in the Jumpseat of a 777, and one of the pilots said the cockpit of the 787 is so quiet because the wipers are stored vertically.
I’d have thought it has more to do with the design of the nose and the fixed windows.
Can anyone point to an authoritative source on the matter?
Thanks

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 1
From: Australia
The position of the wipers makes a huge difference. On the Q400 some pilots activate the wipers and leave them in the close to vertical which reduces the noise considerably. I don't know why the manufactures don't change the parked position to being up to reduce the cockpit noise.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 843
From: Tring, UK
I’ve always wondered how much extra drag windscreen wipers create, and how a mechanism to completely stow them might save a lot of fuel. They’re like little speedbrakes sticking out into the nice laminar flow at the front of the aeroplane, and they do that for the whole sector.
Yes, it would be more mechanically complex, but you’ve already got electric motors and drivetrains. Could be as simple as having some kind of a scuttle, like you do on cars, which the wipers come up from. If it’s worth it on a car, on an aeroplane at >5x the airspeed (>25x the drag) it would seem to make even more sense...
Yes, it would be more mechanically complex, but you’ve already got electric motors and drivetrains. Could be as simple as having some kind of a scuttle, like you do on cars, which the wipers come up from. If it’s worth it on a car, on an aeroplane at >5x the airspeed (>25x the drag) it would seem to make even more sense...
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Wet Season
They’re like little speedbrakes sticking out into the nice laminar flow at the front of the aeroplane
Oh boy, after flying the Airbus for a good number of years, im now in the 737 and its frankly quite bad in that regard. Not sayin the bus is a good system but the 737.....
Oh boy, after flying the Airbus for a good number of years, im now in the 737 and its frankly quite bad in that regard. Not sayin the bus is a good system but the 737.....



Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,345
From: Everett, WA
They’re like little speedbrakes sticking out into the nice laminar flow at the front of the aeroplane
Oh boy, after flying the Airbus for a good number of years, im now in the 737 and its frankly quite bad in that regard. Not sayin the bus is a good system but the 737.....
Oh boy, after flying the Airbus for a good number of years, im now in the 737 and its frankly quite bad in that regard. Not sayin the bus is a good system but the 737.....

The 777 flight deck windows are basically flat - that section of the airframe ("41 Section" in Boeing speak) is common between the 757, 767, and 777. The 787 flight deck has curved windows and is aerodynamically cleaner than the 777 which would improve the flight deck noise - although I can't quantify that.




