Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Fuel jettisoning

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Fuel jettisoning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th October 2021 | 00:05
  #1 (permalink)  
SRS
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: UK
Fuel jettisoning

If the decision to dumb fuel is made are there any restrictions to jettisoning in cruise if permission is obtained? Like over the sea on the way to an alternate airport so as not to waste time in holding. The type is a B744 where Up to 45 min may be needed to reduce to max landing weight.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
SRS is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2021 | 05:08
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 336
Likes: 15
From: Dubai
Some places have specific locations. Over the sea is preferable, generally above 5000' is a requirement. Avoid jettisoning whilst descending in the hold and near thunderstorms. I don't see a problem with jettisoning in the cruise and would be the sensible option as most diversions that require jettisoning would be time critical.
Kennytheking is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2021 | 10:36
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 845
From: Tring, UK
Having done it a few times, yes, cruise is likely best. You’re also going to be going much faster (TAS) than low level or holding, so the fuel will be better dispersed as it comes out at the same rate.
FullWings is offline  
Reply
Old 25th October 2021 | 01:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
It takes some common sense planning. The goal is to LAND at or near MLW, NOT achieve MLW at some remote location then transit to the runway. Given that the difference between MZFW and MLW can be not that much, poor planning can leave you in a low fuel state.

I did hear a lot of folk-lore about jettison in the sim- thing like "Don't descend in a hold while dumping- you'll catch up with the fuel and set it on fire", and "Don't dump if there are CBs around- a lightning strike will blow you up".

Sounded like BS and certainly wasn't backed up by any litterature, but i actually got tp train a KC 135 pilot, and they obvioulsy know a thing or two about fuel. He confirmed no such concerns were valid.
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 25th October 2021 | 09:11
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 59
From: OZ
Hey Full Wings,
TAS is irrelevant, it's IAS which will disperse the cloud of fuel.
I was involved in it once and on the B744 it's quite spectacular.
mustafagander is offline  
Reply
Old 25th October 2021 | 16:29
  #6 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 265
Likes: 164
From: Sunnydale
Yet items like that (dump and descend and dump near CB) have made it in to my company’s OMA. If it’s BS where has it come from. I don’t know enough to be able to say to my employer “your OMA is wrong”.
back to Boeing is offline  
Reply
Old 25th October 2021 | 21:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Interesting- who is your employer?
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.