Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Saving climb fuel

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Saving climb fuel

Old 5th Sep 2021, 14:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6
Saving climb fuel

I've found that you can climb at speed faster than max rate climb speed (Vy) and save fuel. When you climb at faster speed, you will get a longer ground distance. So if you climb from the same starting point, to the same target point at higher altitude, a climb at lower speed will need to fly level after reaching target altitude to get to target point. When adding fuel used from both climb leg and cruise leg, the total fuel used can be higher than fuel used from the direct climb to target point at higher speed. Is this a common knowledge? Is it used in some useful applications?
LLClimb is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2021, 16:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: England
Posts: 393
Doh! You had better tell Airbus.
Capt Scribble is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2021, 20:21
  #3 (permalink)  
JRK
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 66
When I climb I am usually too busy watching the magnificent scenery outside to bother about such a thing.
JRK is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2021, 20:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The sky
Posts: 257
Max rate of climb is min fuel? Since when?

Cost index zero is min fuel (at least at my outfit) and CI 20 is min cost. Neither produces a climb speed at Vy unless itís a coincidence and both vary dependent on the wind.
Locked door is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2021, 20:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Amantido
Posts: 914
I let VNAV do the job, according the CI entered and TOC wind. If I am requested best rate, I have the option on the CLB page.

Banana Joe is online now  
Old 5th Sep 2021, 20:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Amantido
Posts: 914
Locked door

I remember being told at ground school during my ATPL that climb at full thrust actually saves fuel as you spend less time at climb power and more at cruise power. But you increase maintenance costs.
Banana Joe is online now  
Old 5th Sep 2021, 21:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: England
Posts: 393
Faster speed, increased drag, lower for longer and climb thrust all increase fuel burn. I'm not clever enough to do the math but the FMGC is.
Capt Scribble is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2021, 23:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: goofyland
Posts: 47
Vmo minus a few knots, you get there quicker and ATC thinks youíre bad ass and not to be trifled with. Mike drop.
Occy is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2021, 23:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 38S45
Posts: 9
Our company SOP was to use CLB rather than de-rate even after a TO-1 or -2 departure. All our ops were at CI15.

SoulMinties is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2021, 00:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Age: 38
Posts: 824
The difference being, the level segment at TOC is done at a far higher density altitude than your suggested high-speed cruise climb through the lower altitudes. Higher DA = Lower pressure = lower drag.

Lower altitude = higher air pressure = lower TAS for given IAS = more drag = more fuel used in that climb. Best bet as a rule of thumb? Ignoring wind, get as high as you can, as quickly as you can, and stay there as long as you can are the keys to saving fuel. In normal ops? put your desired CI in the box and let it do the thinking for you. It can do it faster and better than I ever could.
KRviator is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2021, 04:08
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6
There is a climb speed, called “Lean and Long Climb (LLC)” speed that maximizes fuel saving from a direct climb to a target point at higher altitude, over an indirect climb with minimum fuel climb plus maximum range cruise to the same target point. I’m preparing an article on LLC to submit to AIAA Journal. I just need to know if I’m repeating a work someone else has done already.
LLClimb is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2021, 04:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,023
https://www.aircraftit.com/news/sky-...on-opti-climb/
It's different than what you think.

Last edited by vilas; 6th Sep 2021 at 05:49.
vilas is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2021, 13:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: aaa
Posts: 154
Archive mole

Amen Brother 🙏
SpamCanDriver is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2021, 16:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: If this is Tuesday, it must be?
Posts: 627
We don't have CI on our little brain FMSs, but for the Challenger 604/605 series 10 minutes with the Flight Planning manual tells you that according to Bombardier you use less fuel to a point along track by climbing at higher speeds than by climbing at max rate then cruising. But what does the manufacturer know, eh?
BizJetJock is online now  
Old 6th Sep 2021, 16:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: under the sea
Posts: 2,582
Climb quickly into a tailwind and slowly into an increasing headwind seems to work.
tubby linton is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2021, 17:05
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nearer home than before!
Posts: 511
We don't have the choice. Just CI and ECON all the time. Policy of dumbing down to prepare us to fly the French things soon.
RVF750 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2021, 20:10
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 66
Posts: 3,412
It may not be universal, but I saw a study ~20 years ago that for the 757/PW2000, derated climb was a false economy. Derated climb increased fuel burn, and it didn't do anything positive for the engines. In fact, some derated climbs could cause the compressor stators to operate in a range that could cause harmonics that could crack the stators.
tdracer is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2021, 05:30
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6
Optimum speed?

BizJetJock

Very interesting. Does Bombardier recommend a speed to climb to a point?
LLClimb is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2021, 11:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: If this is Tuesday, it must be?
Posts: 627
No they don't specifically recommend a profile. They just give fuel/time/distance tables for 2 profiles - 250/.72 (best climb) and 300/.78 (high speed).
When you compare the fuel to climb at 300/.78 with the fuel to climb at 250/.72 then cruise to the same point you get a lower fuel burn. Not by a lot, but it is definitely not more!
BizJetJock is online now  
Old 7th Sep 2021, 12:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 3,782
There is a climb speed, called “Lean and Long Climb (LLC)” speed
Not something I have heard of.
I just follow the company standard procedures which no doubt closely follow the manufacturers procedures.
There is always times when you can save some fuel based on your experience and common sense…. but without rewriting the Performance Manual!
Capt Fathom is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.