Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Combining Pax and Cargo in Cabin & Printed MEL

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Combining Pax and Cargo in Cabin & Printed MEL

Old 8th May 2021, 10:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: cairo
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Combining Pax and Cargo in Cabin & Printed MEL

I have 2 questions and would appreciate some guidance on them

1- What are the regulations in regards to combining passengers and Cargo on seats in cabin ?

For example I have 20 passengers booked on a 737 and I have 10 Tons of Cargo (Perishables) , can I load all 20 pax on the forward and load the cargo on the pax seats on the remaining seats? Or does it have to be a full pax or full cargo on seats ?


My 2nd question is about legality of printing pages from MEL & Carrying them onboard along with briefing package

For example Dispatch prints MEL for the subject item and hand over to crew along with FP, would that be considered a finding since the document has now become an uncontrolled document ? Or is this a normal procedure for some operators ?

Thank You
A300driver is offline  
Old 8th May 2021, 11:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SS Enterprise
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe it depends on the country?

In regards to MEL, dont you need to carry a library of operational documents in the cockpit? I have never operated without a complete copy of the MEL? You must have a company policy in this?

If you seat pack the cargo then comply with the seat pack limitations. Ones I have used include not seat packing exit rows, there was something about pax being located behind seat packed rows ( maybe ). Maximum weight per seat pack etc. Again there must be a company policy on use of seat packs?
Qwark is offline  
Old 8th May 2021, 12:54
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: cairo
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's agree that in Aviation everything varies from country to another but they all refer at the end to EASA / FAA / ICAO etc... And aircraft manufacturers
Company Policy is why I am asking this question
recently a new policy is being rolled out that makes Dispatchers responsible for printing the MEL Page of the applicable snag and providing the crew of the printed copy along with the briefing pack, as a way of reducing crew work load by looking up MELs themselves, I find this to be stupid to be honest and also it gives a way for SAFA inspections for a finding by having an uncontrolled document in the cockpit

Again as for cargo on seats, what is the regulation ? Boeing MOM doesn't mention anything about combining pax and cargo on the same aircraft hence I am asking for guidance

Thanks
A300driver is offline  
Old 8th May 2021, 13:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 3,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Logic would dictate you put the pax behind the cargo. No hazmat to be carried.
Passengers would need access to emergency exits. Depending on the type of exit I believe itís 5,7 or 12 pax per exit.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 8th May 2021, 23:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SAYE
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Full MEL and AFM on iPad EFB (or in binders); relevant pages [extra] printout makes it easier, readily accessible and safer.

No issues with cargo properly secured on seats; exit rows seats either empty or with able PAX.
avionimc is offline  
Old 9th May 2021, 13:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: 43N
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As part of our maintenance release document, any MEL ‘snag’ as you term it (we call them hits) is printed. We started carrying the complete MEL a few years ago. It is helpful to expand knowledge of an enroute maintenance issue but not controlling until the next release.

When you say “uncontrolled” if it is part of the flight release paperwork as noted in your flight operations manual, I don’t see how any regulatory agency could make an issue of that. If a foreign inspector would take issue with that, your company would have to address that in your operations manual.

For example many years ago, German ramp inspectors demanded to see a liability certificate of insurance. We now have in our operations manual a copy of a liability certificate of insurance.
CaptainMongo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2022 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.