Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Why no CAT technology for airband radio?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Why no CAT technology for airband radio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Mar 2021, 09:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why no CAT technology for airband radio?

A friend of mine is a decent HAM and now started to learn to fly. When we had a discussion on airfield operations he asked a question I never thought about it:

Why lack usual airband transceiver CAT capability?

During the conversation I learned that almost all HAM radios now come with CAT interface and most of the operator don't use the physical radio controls, but a computer and headset. If I understand correct, the only thing you need is a sound card to get audio in and out, some switch to do PTT and a way to tell the radio which frequency to go. That neither sounds rocket science, nor expensive. So, what is your opinion, why don't they spend the sub-£ circuit to give us a full control USB connection to a (handheld?) airband radio?
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 10:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,494
Received 104 Likes on 62 Posts
I assume CAT in this context is computer aided transmissions, or something?

I think it is desirable from an operational point of view to have physical knobs and controls on the radios - think about smoke in the cockpit for example.

On Airbus we can remotely control any radio from any Audio Control Panel e.g. 'post' frequencies to other radios. On some other aircraft types, e.g. Dash 8; Comm radios can be preloaded with, I think it was eight frequencies for easy selection. But they all have actual knobs and controls.

I would like to know when they will introduce digital audio modulation of HF radio. That would vastly improve that service.
Uplinker is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 10:12
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAT is Computer Aided Transceiver. Yes, physical knobs do have advantages, but the whole world did jump on the 'Digital Religion' train already. You can always use knobs, they don't have to use physical connection, as in many other applications, where you do have knobs driving a computer driving the function.
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 11:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 682
Received 109 Likes on 32 Posts
One word - costs.

Certification costs to fix something that isn’t broken.

If you think VHF sucks, you should see what the latest and greatest aircraft have in terms of a HF rig!
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 13:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up yer nose, again.
Age: 67
Posts: 1,232
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Up until the time I quit flying 25 years ago a pilot flying light aircraft could climb into any aircraft and it didn't matter what brand avionics it was fitted with the pilot could operate them because they all operated the same way. Secondly having a physical knob is a huge plus when flying in turbulence.
Peter Fanelli is online now  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 14:41
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, all granted.

But - we need future, not tales on the ocean when we were protozoon ...
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 15:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I can figure out what you're describing, but not completely sure. But it seems that at least one quality is that the tuning unit is separate from the physical radio itself... and this is already the case in modern airliners. The radio itself is in a rack in the belly of the plane, while the box in the cockpit just displays the frequency and has a knob to tune a new one. Is there anything more to it?
Vessbot is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 16:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Washington.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,077
Received 151 Likes on 53 Posts
From a certification perspective, and from a operational perspective, one would need to prove the reliability of frequency selection. Communications, and communication with who you intend to communicate with is safety critical. Who are you listening to? What alerts, warnings or instructions might you be missing, because you are no longer tuned to the frequency you thought you were?
GlobalNav is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 17:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
" Alexa, tune com 1 to 118.65"
dixi188 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 18:49
  #10 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If we are to believe the future plans , data link will make all this redundant , the next frequency will be automatically uploaded by ATC , and you just have to accept , the D/L will then send a message back that you have gone to the next frequency and another that will make your call sign pop up on a screen. You can even skip the Good morning and Good bye. You can even select the language you want the box to display.. No need to speak anymore... wonderful future
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2021, 20:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It already works that way in some sectors. And equipped airplanes, which is a bit more scarce. And that is fine, but for something where immediate action is required, there is still the fallback to voice.
Denti is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2021, 00:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia the Awesome
Posts: 399
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATC Watcher

The 787 has this capability for both VHF and HF, very useful when busy airwaves or the controller "forgot" to transfer you.
Roj approved is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2021, 09:17
  #13 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did not know they were so advanced, you mean no tuning of frequencies needed anymore , just accepting the D/L messages automatically tunes in the right frequency ?
Is that on all 787s or only recent ones with a specific avionic suite ?
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2021, 11:08
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia the Awesome
Posts: 399
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew the 787-8 between 2013 and 2018, and it was a thing. Not sure of the “newness” of the avionics suite.
Roj approved is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2021, 18:08
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dixi188
" Alexa, tune com 1 to 118.65"
“Ok, setting speed to 118 knots- Mach point 65”
Check Airman is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2021, 18:59
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Washington.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,077
Received 151 Likes on 53 Posts
What wasn't "Alexa" (and Siri) named "Murphy"?
GlobalNav is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2021, 21:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Age: 70
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Check Airman
“Ok, setting speed to 118 knots- Mach point 65”
Perfect!!!
ex-EGLL is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2021, 13:04
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 686
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
787s may have magic auto tuned radios, but they forgot to do the basic voice modulation - so many of them have the crappiest radios on the airport and you can almost know the aircraft type just from the carrier wave noise of their radios.
Dan Dare is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.