Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

EGPWS escape altitudes.

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

EGPWS escape altitudes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th October 2020 | 09:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Vladivostok
EGPWS escape altitudes.

Hello everyone! 2 interesting questions. During terrain escape procedure ( radar vectors to mountain after takeoff scenario) shall we use MSA(SID plate) to climb or MVA (Radar mnm alts jepp plate) , and another question shall we stay with QNH or set STD?

​​​​​Answer with reference please.thanx.

​​​
Sergei.a320 is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2020 | 09:56
  #2 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 154
From: Having a margarita on the beach
Originally Posted by Sergei.a320
Hello everyone! 2 interesting questions. During terrain escape procedure ( radar vectors to mountain after takeoff scenario) shall we use MSA(SID plate) to climb or MVA (Radar mnm alts jepp plate) , and another question shall we stay with QNH or set STD?

​​​​​Answer with reference please.thanx.

​​​
Hi !

The question shows that this exercise was unfortunately not properly debriefed by the instructor.

First thing first, the EGPWS scenario exercise is extremely prone to negative training unless : the instructor briefs the crew "for training purposes and only for the purpose of practicing the procedure I will vector You towards high terrain. I will ask You to disregard the terrain look ahead functions generating the cautions such as terrain ahead and wait for the warning including the pull up call." Then the instructor checks and agrees with the trainees for the appropriate altitude needed for the escape maneuver (it is training, not a check), in that case the MSA as it represents the minimum altitude in that sector granting you 1000 ft over the obstacle, provided You are still within 25NM from the reference, otherwise You need to go and look for the applicable Grid MORA.
MRVA's are used when published to crosscheck the altitudes issued by ATC. All based on QNH (tho you might have FL shown on MRVAs).
The above references are 100% in Your OM-C.
sonicbum is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2020 | 14:20
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 137
From: USA
Personally, I’m unlikely to have the radar minimum altitudes chart open, so it’d be MSA (or MEA if further out) for me.

QNH vs QNE? That’s never come up before. I guess for high alt airports, in that situation, I’d just wait for the plane to remind me (Airbus).
Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2020 | 15:34
  #4 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 151
Likes: 48
From: Aus
Maximum thrust
climb like nobody’s business
until TERRAIN CLEARANCE is assured.

MSA is generally a good start. But depending on where you are and why your triggered the warning, it may change the final altitude climbed to. Day light VMC may allow a completely different response to a night time or IMC event.
Switchbait is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.