A320 FPV and unreliable airspeed
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Utopia
A320 FPV and unreliable airspeed

The above is a para from FCTM UAS chapter. I don't understand how the FPV is affected along with the barometric altitude. It may be recalled that ADR provides barometric altitude and FPV is supplied by the IR part. UAS is a resultant of pitot/static blockage and not related to IR failure. How is FPV affected in this case? Any thoughts?
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 829
Likes: 9
From: taking up the hold
A common misconception. The bird is primarily IRS derived but also has a static input. See below from the FCTM (my bold).
FCTM > Aircraft systems > Bird
RELIABILITY
The bird is computed from IRS data and is affected by inertial errors. During the approach, the flight crew may detect a small track error, usually up to +/-2 °.
The bird is also computed from static pressure information. Therefore, if the altitude information is not reliable, the flight crew must consider the bird as not reliable.
FCTM > Aircraft systems > Bird
RELIABILITY
The bird is computed from IRS data and is affected by inertial errors. During the approach, the flight crew may detect a small track error, usually up to +/-2 °.
The bird is also computed from static pressure information. Therefore, if the altitude information is not reliable, the flight crew must consider the bird as not reliable.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 829
Likes: 9
From: taking up the hold
You might be over thinking this. The FCOM is notoriously sketchy with its information, giving you only what Airbus think you need to know. If the FCOM stated that the bird DID NOT have a static feed while the FCTM said it did then I would obviously go with the FCOM. However in this case I believe that the FCTM is adding information to that given in the FCOM rather than directly contradicting it.

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 154
From: Having a margarita on the beach

The above is a para from FCTM UAS chapter. I don't understand how the FPV is affected along with the barometric altitude. It may be recalled that ADR provides barometric altitude and FPV is supplied by the IR part. UAS is a resultant of pitot/static blockage and not related to IR failure. How is FPV affected in this case? Any thoughts?

Joined: Jul 2009
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 241
Likes: 50
From: Coast to Coast...
Thanks A33Zab and sonicbum. Now when the instructor asks me to "switch on the f******" bird!" (on an old sim) for an approach/landing following an unreliable speed incident, I can wipe his nose through this paragraph

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 229
Likes: 2
From: New York
—AoA data (as a red/green/red IAS tape and GPS altitude.
i think by definition IR data can’t be trusted...

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 154
From: Having a margarita on the beach







