Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Do NOT arm the autobrake before ditching?


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Do NOT arm the autobrake before ditching?

Old 13th August 2020 | 09:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Worldwide
Do NOT arm the autobrake before ditching?

Here's a tricky one for the 747-400 whisperers:

Checklist item 4 in the DITCHING checklist in the B747-400 QRH states "DO NOT ARM THE AUTOBRAKE."

Does anyone have any idea for which technical reason this is stated in the checklist? On the face of it one would think that the autobrake setting is irrelevant in a ditching with the gear up, but if Boeing puts it in the checklist there must be a good reason for it.



NGjockey is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2020 | 09:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: here
Wet contaminated ‘surface‘ to prevent hydroplaning 😉
Sorry being silly I would like to know reason too
victorpapa is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2020 | 10:07
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 1
From: USA
It is solely mentioned to provide consistency with the checklist format.
B-HKD is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2020 | 10:15
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 10
From: 4 seasons hotel
Pretty obvious, no reason to arm the autobrake as you would ditch with landing gear up mate.
flightleader is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2020 | 11:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by flightleader
Pretty obvious, no reason to arm the autobrake as you would ditch with landing gear up mate.

How does arming it caused harm?
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2020 | 11:37
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 23
From: Seoul/Gold Coast.....
I assume that most NNC are written by pilots/engineers then vetted by lawyers to make sure that it will stand up in court during the enquiry/inquest, to eliminate any doubt they might insert a statement which although obvious to most in the profession, could be manipulated in court to apportion/direct blame to innocent parties.
zlin77 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2020 | 11:37
  #7 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 129
Likes: 169
From: Null Island
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
How does arming it caused harm?
We don't know but that, I think, was the purpose of the question.
Compton3fox is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2020 | 11:46
  #8 (permalink)  
BBK
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 501
Likes: 35
From: UK
Maintaining hyd pressure?

Without digging out the QRH I seem to recall there’s something in there about preserving hydraulic pressure system so that the gear doors stay closed which would help in a ditching.

Happy to be corrected if I’ve completely misremembered this! If in doubt just do what the QRH says as there may be system interactions that are not obvious. A lot of thought goes into these checklists.
BBK is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2020 | 21:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
The presumption is you are ditching with no engine power, therefore no normal electric power, and therefore no hydraulic power generation as you drop below flight speed. You don't want to waste the remaining stored hydraulic energy on unneeded brake actuation when you may need it for flight control movement after the first bounce or two off the wave tops, or to try to keep the gear doors shut as stated by BBK above. I suspect the gear doors get ripped off pretty early in the process, though, in an open ocean situation with waves.

Dave Therhino is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 01:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: unknown
Originally Posted by Dave Therhino
The presumption is you are ditching with no engine power, therefore no normal electric power, and therefore no hydraulic power generation as you drop below flight speed. You don't want to waste the remaining stored hydraulic energy on unneeded brake actuation when you may need it for flight control movement after the first bounce or two off the wave tops, or to try to keep the gear doors shut as stated by BBK above. I suspect the gear doors get ripped off pretty early in the process, though, in an open ocean situation with waves.
The can definitely be reasons for ditching with engine power, so best not to presume that.
tcasblue is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 04:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
Originally Posted by tcasblue
The can definitely be reasons for ditching with engine power, so best not to presume that.
I was talking about the engineering basis for that step in the procedure, not presuming that all ditchings are engine out
Dave Therhino is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 11:37
  #12 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 81
Likes: 7
From: UK
Originally Posted by Dave Therhino
The presumption is you are ditching with no engine power, therefore no normal electric power, and therefore no hydraulic power generation as you drop below flight speed. You don't want to waste the remaining stored hydraulic energy on unneeded brake actuation when you may need it for flight control movement after the first bounce or two off the wave tops, or to try to keep the gear doors shut as stated by BBK above. I suspect the gear doors get ripped off pretty early in the process, though, in an open ocean situation with waves.
Why would the brakes start actuating with the gear up and locked?

Does arming the autobrake system consumes hydraulic power?
medod is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 15:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
Arming the system does not use significant hydraulic power, and they would be armed on approach while the engines were still windmilling enough to produce enough hydraulic power for adequate flight control (if you were ditching with engines not running).

The autobrakes would not actuate unless a bunch of gear and wheel sensor mayhem occurred upon striking the water, but I believe this unlikely scenario is what Boeing was accounting for with that advice/step in the procedure. Given the logic for autobrake actuation, I agree it's very unlikely for autobrakes to be triggered.
Dave Therhino is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 15:30
  #14 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
Originally Posted by Dave Therhino
The presumption is you are ditching with no engine power, therefore no normal electric power, and therefore no hydraulic power generation as you drop below flight speed. You don't want to waste the remaining stored hydraulic energy on unneeded brake actuation when you may need it for flight control movement after the first bounce or two off the wave tops, or to try to keep the gear doors shut as stated by BBK above. I suspect the gear doors get ripped off pretty early in the process, though, in an open ocean situation with waves.
What about hydraulic pressure from windmilling, in order to keep the flight control circuits pressurized?
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 18:31
  #15 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,683
Likes: 3,357
From: Everett, WA
Originally Posted by Pugilistic Animus
What about hydraulic pressure from windmilling, in order to keep the flight control circuits pressurized?
The windmilling hydraulic pressure is small - barely enough to control the aircraft at approach speeds (particularly on the 747-400 - as the bypass ratio of the engines increase, the windmill N2 decreases everything else being equal). Slower speeds mean slower windmill mean lower hydraulic pressure. Hence anything you can do to reduce hydraulic demand during a dead stick is goodness.
tdracer is online now  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 20:11
  #16 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
Thanks TdRacer for clarifying that for me. I think that I read Dave Therino's post wrong also but now it's completely clear to me
thanks Gentlemen
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply
Old 15th August 2020 | 05:02
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: unknown
Originally Posted by tdracer
The windmilling hydraulic pressure is small - barely enough to control the aircraft at approach speeds (particularly on the 747-400 - as the bypass ratio of the engines increase, the windmill N2 decreases everything else being equal). Slower speeds mean slower windmill mean lower hydraulic pressure. Hence anything you can do to reduce hydraulic demand during a dead stick is goodness.
I feel a little silly for not knowing this but.....how does arming the autobrake increase hydraulic demand? Locked wheel protection?
tcasblue is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.