RNAV GNSS source change
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Turkey
RNAV GNSS source change
I have a question regarding RNAV equipment. Does RNAV equipments manufactured to use only one GNSS system (e.g. GPS or Galileo) or do they have ability to change GNSS if the original one is not available. So my questions are; let’s say you are using Garmin 1000 (or any other RNAV system you are familiar with) and flying from US to Europe:
I’m looking for answers for different kind of systems including large jet FMSs. Please indicate the system your most familiar with. Thanks.
- Does it automatically switch to
EGNOSGalileo or does it continue to use GPS. - In case of a problem with GPS signal does it have capability to change to
EGNOSGalileo.
I’m looking for answers for different kind of systems including large jet FMSs. Please indicate the system your most familiar with. Thanks.
Last edited by derdere; 21st June 2020 at 06:23.
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Far east
I used to fly DHC 8-400.
There were two types of FMS.
If it equipped with newer UNS-1Ew, it can receive WAAS, EGNOS, MSAS and GAGAN with operators choice in addition to the conventional GPS.
If with older UNS-1E, no ability to use any of above SBAS systems.
There were two types of FMS.
If it equipped with newer UNS-1Ew, it can receive WAAS, EGNOS, MSAS and GAGAN with operators choice in addition to the conventional GPS.
If with older UNS-1E, no ability to use any of above SBAS systems.
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 10
From: Kiwiland
As far as I understand it, The GPS receivers use both systems all the time. No one is interested which system a particular system a satellite belongs to .... there is just twice as many boxes floating round up there, than a single system provides. Both systems have global coverage, so it’s not like you’re physically travelling from one system to other....
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 230
Likes: 138
From: Usually on top
EGNOS, MSAS, GAGAN, and WAAS are all satellite based augmentation systems (SBAS): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe...verlay_Service
Beacon Outbound
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 710
Likes: 22
From: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 230
Likes: 138
From: Usually on top
It actually doesn't. WAAS (as well as all other SBAS) make use of geostationary satellites to transmit the correction signal, while the GNSS satellites themselves are in medium earth orbit (MEO).
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 137
From: USA
I should’ve been more clear. In my understanding (please correct me if I’m wrong) the SBAS satellites alone won’t give you a signal. You need the basic NAVSTAR satellites to give you a position, and the WAAS ones will supply the correction.
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 230
Likes: 138
From: Usually on top
Yes that is correct. Your GNSS receiver can use the GPS (formerly NAVSTAR), GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, or any combination of those systems satellites depending on the receiver's capabilities to calculate its position and state vectors, even without SBAS. SBAS without the GNSS satellites however gives you no position. SBAS typically improves the position accuracy by an order of magnitude or better (e.g. 10m precision to <1m precision), and provides additional system integrity information.
The predominant error source for position information with GNSS is in the signal path delays due to the variability of water vapour in the atmosphere. Water vapour affects the refractive index of the atmosphere at radio wavelengths, hence causes the signals to not travel in a straight line, thus the signal travels a longer distance than the assumed straight line. This translates into what's called a "path delay". The ground monitoring stations for the SBAS know their exact locations, and can reverse engineer the approximate path delays over a larger area (not just where the reference ground station is located), which in turn can be used to model the water vapour distribution in the atmosphere and depending on the receivers position, a correction factor for each signal path can then be calculated. This is also useful for other things like radio astronomy.
The predominant error source for position information with GNSS is in the signal path delays due to the variability of water vapour in the atmosphere. Water vapour affects the refractive index of the atmosphere at radio wavelengths, hence causes the signals to not travel in a straight line, thus the signal travels a longer distance than the assumed straight line. This translates into what's called a "path delay". The ground monitoring stations for the SBAS know their exact locations, and can reverse engineer the approximate path delays over a larger area (not just where the reference ground station is located), which in turn can be used to model the water vapour distribution in the atmosphere and depending on the receivers position, a correction factor for each signal path can then be calculated. This is also useful for other things like radio astronomy.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 137
From: USA
Yes that is correct. Your GNSS receiver can use the GPS (formerly NAVSTAR), GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, or any combination of those systems satellites depending on the receiver's capabilities to calculate its position and state vectors, even without SBAS. SBAS without the GNSS satellites however gives you no position. SBAS typically improves the position accuracy by an order of magnitude or better (e.g. 10m precision to <1m precision), and provides additional system integrity information.
The predominant error source for position information with GNSS is in the signal path delays due to the variability of water vapour in the atmosphere. Water vapour affects the refractive index of the atmosphere at radio wavelengths, hence causes the signals to not travel in a straight line, thus the signal travels a longer distance than the assumed straight line. This translates into what's called a "path delay". The ground monitoring stations for the SBAS know their exact locations, and can reverse engineer the approximate path delays over a larger area (not just where the reference ground station is located), which in turn can be used to model the water vapour distribution in the atmosphere and depending on the receivers position, a correction factor for each signal path can then be calculated. This is also useful for other things like radio astronomy.
The predominant error source for position information with GNSS is in the signal path delays due to the variability of water vapour in the atmosphere. Water vapour affects the refractive index of the atmosphere at radio wavelengths, hence causes the signals to not travel in a straight line, thus the signal travels a longer distance than the assumed straight line. This translates into what's called a "path delay". The ground monitoring stations for the SBAS know their exact locations, and can reverse engineer the approximate path delays over a larger area (not just where the reference ground station is located), which in turn can be used to model the water vapour distribution in the atmosphere and depending on the receivers position, a correction factor for each signal path can then be calculated. This is also useful for other things like radio astronomy.
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Turkey
Thanks for all the answers. I learned a huge deal myself. I admit I made a couple of terminology mistakes myself in the question, which veered off the discussion a little bit.
However I’m looking for a practical aspect of the system. To re-iterate:
1. Does each RNAV system comes PRE-set to work with only one GNSS system. If not, does pilot has any control over it to select which one to use (e.g. switching from GPS to Galileo).
2. Is there a automatic switch between GNSSs in case of failure in one.
If you can specify systems you’re using that would be an awesome direction for me to make further research.
Again thanks for the answers. Cheers.
However I’m looking for a practical aspect of the system. To re-iterate:
1. Does each RNAV system comes PRE-set to work with only one GNSS system. If not, does pilot has any control over it to select which one to use (e.g. switching from GPS to Galileo).
2. Is there a automatic switch between GNSSs in case of failure in one.
If you can specify systems you’re using that would be an awesome direction for me to make further research.
Again thanks for the answers. Cheers.
