Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Salvage A380 engines

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Salvage A380 engines

Old 17th May 2020, 13:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 57
Posts: 216
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Salvage A380 engines

Is there an existing twin engined airliner which perhaps the A380 engines ( at least the ones made with thrust reversers ) , could be modified to work on? Seems a great pity to mothball so much equipment.
Fluke is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 15:40
  #2 (permalink)  

Dog Tired
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What about the wing-height ?
fantom is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 16:08
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,215
Received 135 Likes on 62 Posts

Hat, Coat, Briefcase, Roller bag, Emergency slide.......
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 20:10
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,431
Received 186 Likes on 90 Posts
Short answer is no.
First, you don't just hang an engine on wing of a new aircraft and go flying - there is a massive amount of engineering that goes into integrating the engine to the airframe. Structures, fuel, avionics, hydraulics, electrical power generation, FADEC/instrumentation, etc. Rare is the new engine installation that doesn't require significant airframe changes to make it viable. Plus, a new engine installation triggers the Change Product Rule, so it's a major certification effort. If you started work today, you're talking a three to four year program before it's certified for commercial service.
Second, you're still talking a previous generation engine tech - the latest generation of engines is already several percent better in fuel burn (e.g. GEnx and GE9X).
Third, what airframe would it fit? It's too big for a 767/A330 (and the NEO already exists for the A330), too small for the 787/A350.

Big Pistons - I WANT ONE!!!
tdracer is offline  
Old 17th May 2020, 20:51
  #5 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Imagination running wild, what about the other way around? Trent XBW for the dugong, enabling a stretch. The redesigned fuselage comes with a reinforced floor for the cargo variant (where volume matters), and the cockpit is pushed upwards(*) to allow for nose-loading door. Bleedless installation.

(*) or somewhere else completely, synthetic vision permitting.

Oh, sorry, this thread is saving the engines not the skeleton. Sounds like a new aircraft anyway.

(exits stage through the trap-door)
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 20th May 2020, 16:00
  #6 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,680
Received 71 Likes on 45 Posts
.B-52 ,as replacements for each pair,or maybe Mr Antonov.....
sycamore is offline  
Old 20th May 2020, 18:59
  #7 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: USVI
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the engines will be kept around as spares for the A388 that are still flying..

I see Lufthansa Teknik has an A388F conversion, so they may be around for a while
turbidus is offline  
Old 20th May 2020, 20:28
  #8 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,912
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by turbidus

I see Lufthansa Teknik has an A388F conversion, so they may be around for a while
Say what??
atakacs is offline  
Old 20th May 2020, 20:48
  #9 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,086
Received 68 Likes on 42 Posts
This is for makeshift package freighters only non-permanently converted from now unused passenger airplanes. Corona express cargo and such. It will still need some paperwork and they did some refit kit. It is neither P2F nor freighter. Just an empty passenger cabin used to store lightweight cargo. Boeing and Airbus have similar conversion kits.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 20th May 2020, 21:34
  #10 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,912
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Oh OK.

Because as you are most likely aware the 380 is structurally inefficient as a freighter (a 777F is hauling significantly more cargo per weight). Not to mention the loading issues.

Unfortunately atm the is very little in sight for what remains the best passenger experience in the market 🙄
atakacs is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.