Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

NO NAV INTERCEPT

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

NO NAV INTERCEPT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th March 2020 | 04:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
NO NAV INTERCEPT

So, we were diverting around weather the other night and set an offset of 30Nm right from our planned route through the FMGC in our A320. After inserting the offset the PF used HDG mode to cut through the middle of our planned route and the set offset and armed NAV later on. We got a NO NAV INTCPT message on the scratchpad, knew what it meant but ignored it. At a later point we noticed the lateral deviation from our planned route was greater than 30Nm yet we were still inside the two lines of the offset and planned route. At one point we thought we had deviated more than 30Nm but looking at the ND pictorial that wasn’t the case. What also made it more confusing is that even when turned left to re intercept planned route the lateral displacement was still counting up? Any ideas or knowledge as to what happened here?
STLTH is offline  
Reply
Old 4th March 2020 | 05:54
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 509
Likes: 3
From: United States of Europe
When you enter an OFFSET and subsequently you fly in HDG, the flightplan will not automatically sequence, unless you pass the wpt within 5NM. Before arming NAV check your ‘TO-waypoint’.
OPEN DES is offline  
Reply
Old 4th March 2020 | 09:24
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
So the To Waypoint not sequencing was the reason for the excessive indicated lateral displacement?
STLTH is offline  
Reply
Old 4th March 2020 | 10:06
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
Yes it was GPS equipped, the correct offset was displayed on both ND’s, ADIRS were within limits but not sure about the NAV Accuracy, didn’t check that. We deleted the offset and re inserted it and that fixed the issue.
STLTH is offline  
Reply
Old 4th March 2020 | 12:06
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 509
Likes: 3
From: United States of Europe
The excessive xtk error was most likely caused by the non-sequencing of the the flightplan. I.e. XTK error based on a flightplan leg well behind you!
OPEN DES is offline  
Reply
Old 4th March 2020 | 23:39
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
Thanks for your input guys, if it happens again, I shall update you all.
STLTH is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.