Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Engine failure on Trijets

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Engine failure on Trijets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th January 2020 | 11:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Engine failure on Trijets

Hi there,

I just had a debate with my colleague if Trijets such as a Falcon 7X or a MD11 is subject to Single Engine climb gradients if only one engine fails during takeoff? Obviously the loss of one engine with two remaining operarational isn't 50% thrust loss. How is that calculated and how is the performance of a 3 holer jet affected when it comes to obstable clearence? Maybe a too general question because of numerous factors but I am curious to hear what you experts say...

Cheers
Proline21 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2020 | 12:13
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Hi Proline,

About the MD-11... Yes, it's affected and in some scenarios pilots must follow an engine-out climb procedure in order to comply with the obstacle clearance criteria.

How is it calculated? For reference, there are some tables in the Performance Manual.
hamil is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2020 | 13:06
  #3 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 352
Likes: 148
From: FL390
I would say "yes". Since the logical failure is a single engine, it must have sufficient thrust at that point to achieve the single engine climb gradient. With all three engines running it has 50% additional power, compared to the extra 100% on a twin-jet and the 33% on a four-engine.
Fursty Ferret is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2020 | 16:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 720
Likes: 1
From: N5109.2W10.5
...if Tri-jets such as a Falcon 7X or a MD11 is subject to Single Engine climb gradients if only one engine fails during takeoff?
All perf A aircraft (with 2,3 or 4 engines) have to plan on having one engine fail on take off.
In the case of the TriStar (L1011) on take off from LGW 26L, we had to "swing the cone" (15 degrees left turn with 15 degrees bank - to avoid Russ Hill) with an engine failure.

If we were light, we could do a single engine GA (with 2 engines failed) from about 1500 feet on the approach by descending on the glide path whist accelerating to enable a clean wing then "climb" away (more of a limp really).
Goldenrivett is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2020 | 16:13
  #5 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 15
From: Isla Grande
Originally Posted by Goldenrivett

If we were light, we could do a single engine GA (with 2 engines failed) from about 1500 feet on the approach by descending on the glide path whist accelerating to enable a clean wing then "climb" away (more of a limp really).
Same on B727.
gearlever is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2020 | 17:16
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: EASA land
Second segment climb

Three engined jets have higher required second climb gradient. So the performance of two vs three engined jets can not be directly compared.
TOGA Tap is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2020 | 21:36
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 886
Likes: 235
From: by the seaside
Single engine climb gradient

NO .. only one engine out climb gradient taken into consideration.
Infamous incident on a Trident 3 airborne from Malaga iirc and lost an engine shortly afterwards. Crew didn't check the WAT performance before they diverted to Madrid, typical useless atc for that time lined up an Iberia which forced a missed approach. Aircraft continued descending; skipper fortunately cleaned up to min drag (230 knots?) and accelerated down the valleys which gave him enough performance to return to land.
blind pew is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2020 | 22:09
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Thanks guys for the insight! cheers!
Proline21 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th February 2020 | 04:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
From 14 CFR 25.121:

(b) Takeoff; landing gear retracted. In the takeoff configuration existing at the point of the flight path at which the landing gear is fully retracted, and in the configuration used in Sec. 25.111 but without ground effect:
  • (1) The steady gradient of climb may not be less than 2.4 percent for two-engine airplanes, 2.7 percent for three-engine airplanes, and 3.0 percent for four-engine airplanes, at V2 with:
    • (i) The critical engine inoperative, the remaining engines at the takeoff power or thrust available at the time the landing gear is fully retracted, determined under Sec. 25.111, unless there is a more critical power operating condition existing later along the flight path but before the point where the airplane reaches a height of 400 feet above the takeoff surface; and(ii) The weight equal to the weight existing when the airplane's landing gear is fully retracted, determined under Sec. 25.111.
Dave Therhino is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.