Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

T-tailed Bush Plane

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

T-tailed Bush Plane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jan 2020, 06:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 26.83307 -80.104484
Age: 60
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question T-tailed Bush Plane

Need some technical assistance of an aerodynamic nature? I've been pondering a few issues regarding bush planes specifically those designed for exceptional STOL performance. Watching videos of the Valdez STOL competition virtually all the planes apply and hold brakes while using propwash to lift the tail prior to take off. While this makes perfect sense with a low mounted horizontal stabilizer would the same propwash lift a t-tail plane's "rear-end"? I understand the propwash lifting effect of a tail within the same or near to horizontal axis with a T-tail configuration however the horizontal stabilizer is now above that axis, so would the propwash still lift the tail with the same authority? Thanks!


SeaMac is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2020, 13:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
this goes front wheels first. Slight drift from the question.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2020, 15:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,101
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
I guess I'm not seeing why it should matter, unless the T-tail is high enough to be outside the prop wash. If anything, I'd expect the higher tail to have a slightly higher AOA, assuming the air travels from the prop to tail in a straight line. Also, depending on the height of the propeller, the thrust acting against the locked wheels would create a pretty good nose-down moment even without any lift from the tail.
Chu Chu is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2020, 23:30
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 26.83307 -80.104484
Age: 60
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@N707ZS, Draco is dead, long live Draco. Seems Mr. Patey had some blustery wind issues, thankfully all Pax walked away...
SeaMac is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2020, 23:34
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 26.83307 -80.104484
Age: 60
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Chu Chu, thank you for your input. My research on the subject leads me to believe it is somewhat important being able to get the tail "up" on a short airstrip a term loosely used in the bush...
SeaMac is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2020, 00:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
While it will depend on the exact aircraft type, especially prop radius vs. VS length, a T-tail is generally NOT in the propwash at all, and will behave differently. The propwash is a "tube" the same radius as the prop, and will pass right under the HS.

I got my ticket in a Beech Skipper (T-tail similar to the Piper Traumahawk).

It had noticeably different short/soft-field behavior than low-tail Cessnas/Warriors. Holding the stick back at the start of the roll did nothing at all to raise the nose until about 30 knots IAS - at which point the airspeed (not the propwash) kicked in very suddenly to lower the tail, raise the nose and lift off into ground effect.

With the T-tail, I was trained to be ready to release back-pressure right now once the elevators kicked in, to keep from climbing right out of ground effect and getting a down-check on that portion of the checkride.

And in fact I was warned not to ever take the Skipper onto actual soft-fields, because the T-tail just couldn't protect the nose-wheel as well as low-stabilizer aircraft. T.O. or landing, it was not possible to hold the nose up out of the grass/mud at low airspeeds, due to the lack of propwash over the HS.

Now that is, of course, backwards to raising the tail of a tail-dragger, but it clearly indicated to me that T-tails just don't follow the same rules when it comes to STOL elevator techniques.

Except for a couple of motor-gliders (Dimona and Grob) is there even such a thing as a T-Tail taildragger?
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2020, 03:40
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 26.83307 -80.104484
Age: 60
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Pattern,

Your post was more the experienced based feedback I was looking for and yes there is at least one T-tail taildragger that I know of, the Pipistrel Virus SW also available in tricycle configuration. I had been focussed on the Virus until further research indicated that while you could mount tundra tires it was never designed as a BCP. I figured there might be little chance of a t-tail being "lifted" by propwash but I needed confirmation. My next question would be -I may just need to start a new thread- how about a V-tail being lifted by propwash?

Originally Posted by pattern_is_full
While it will depend on the exact aircraft type, especially prop radius vs. VS length, a T-tail is generally NOT in the propwash at all, and will behave differently. The propwash is a "tube" the same radius as the prop, and will pass right under the HS.

I got my ticket in a Beech Skipper (T-tail similar to the Piper Traumahawk).

It had noticeably different short/soft-field behavior than low-tail Cessnas/Warriors. Holding the stick back at the start of the roll did nothing at all to raise the nose until about 30 knots IAS - at which point the airspeed (not the propwash) kicked in very suddenly to lower the tail, raise the nose and lift off into ground effect.

With the T-tail, I was trained to be ready to release back-pressure right now once the elevators kicked in, to keep from climbing right out of ground effect and getting a down-check on that portion of the checkride.

And in fact I was warned not to ever take the Skipper onto actual soft-fields, because the T-tail just couldn't protect the nose-wheel as well as low-stabilizer aircraft. T.O. or landing, it was not possible to hold the nose up out of the grass/mud at low airspeeds, due to the lack of propwash over the HS.

Now that is, of course, backwards to raising the tail of a tail-dragger, but it clearly indicated to me that T-tails just don't follow the same rules when it comes to STOL elevator techniques.

Except for a couple of motor-gliders (Dimona and Grob) is there even such a thing as a T-Tail taildragger?
SeaMac is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2020, 18:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wilds of Warwickshire
Posts: 240
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
I can certainly attest that this effect works significantly in landings as well. I did my initial training in a Diamond DA20, which is a very clean bit of kit and reluctant to slow down. It has a T tail. So I got into the habit of closing the throttle ‘over the fence’ to ensure we didn’t go too deep. Very little trim change was involved.
Come the day I went to get checked out in a PA28. All went well and the instructor was convinced I could fly, till on final I whacked the throttle closed! Felt like we had been shot down; and suddenly the windscreen was full of grass and runway. The actual touchdown was actually ok, but the instructor had been caught off guard and was not happy.

So yes, T tails give very different handling power in Vs power off.
KiloB is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.