Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Why do the re-engined narrowbodies get new type designations?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Why do the re-engined narrowbodies get new type designations?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st December 2019 | 19:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 137
From: USA
Why do the re-engined narrowbodies get new type designations?

Hi all,

Does anyone know why the neo and max planes have a different type designator? A320->A20N and B738->B38M. As far as ATC goes, the performance is essentially identical, and in the cockpit the systems are similar.
Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 31st December 2019 | 21:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
You need to define what you mean by performance. If it's as simple a $$ per seat mile, it has no relationship to Cert basis.

If it's altitude and/or stall characteristics than likely a designator etc.
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply
Old 31st December 2019 | 22:10
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 79
From: Denver
Type designators are used for planning by airports and fire services (ARFF), as well as ATC.

I'd guess any notable changes in characteristics or dimensions such as weights, door heights, engine ground clearance (e.g. neo and Max), sharklet-heights, fueling points, internal aisle widths, etc. are going to be worth flagging for those ground planners.

Even if they are unimportant in 99.9% of ground operations, there may always be one gate somewhere where the little differences could result in a ripped sharklet or a dented nacelle, unless designated.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2020 | 08:33
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,731
Likes: 2,105
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by pattern_is_full
Type designators are used for planning by airports and fire services (ARFF), as well as ATC.

I'd guess any notable changes in characteristics or dimensions such as weights, door heights, engine ground clearance (e.g. neo and Max), sharklet-heights, fueling points, internal aisle widths, etc. are going to be worth flagging for those ground planners.

Even if they are unimportant in 99.9% of ground operations, there may always be one gate somewhere where the little differences could result in a ripped sharklet or a dented nacelle, unless designated.
All true, although many of those distinctions (sharklets, internal config, etc) are catered for by different IATA codes while still using the same ICAO designator.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2020 | 09:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: UK / FIN
These differences mentioned is important for maintenance providers too, at least if company is having more than one customer to take care. Some operators let you in to their own systems, some not -> need to rely airport information system for times/types etc etc.
We have currently customer flying randomly A32x CEO and NEO. This need to be known before arrival just in case we need to do something, not all guys trained/approved CEO vs NEO. Same with 737 CL/NG.
Corrosion is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.