ADR 1+2+3 FAULT - LDG DIST PROC - no delta VRef?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ADR 1+2+3 FAULT - LDG DIST PROC - no delta VRef?
Happy Christmas!
According my QRH for a very new A320 NEO, under PER-J, there is no delta VRef to apply in the case of an ADR1+2+3 fault, but there is for a dual ADR fault. What am I missing? My guess is Airbus logic is that a triple is also a dual and you must apply the corrections for that first?
According my QRH for a very new A320 NEO, under PER-J, there is no delta VRef to apply in the case of an ADR1+2+3 fault, but there is for a dual ADR fault. What am I missing? My guess is Airbus logic is that a triple is also a dual and you must apply the corrections for that first?
Although, with an ADR 1+2+3 fault (assuming it’s a computer problem rather than a probe issue) the ISIS should still work so calculating an appropriate VAPP could be used to cross check the ISIS with the BUSS green triangle. I’d expect VAPP to be VREF+15 as it’s direct law.
Only half a speed-brake
checked some -214 / -232 / -271N, they show "All ADR OFF" : CF = 3; SPD = n/a
might be the planes are all BUSS equipped.
might be the planes are all BUSS equipped.
Last edited by FlightDetent; 13th Jan 2020 at 13:52.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From FCOM: "ADR3 and STBY speeds use the data of the same probe. Therefore standby instrument must be used with care".
EFB gives landing distance separately for ADR 1+2 and ADR1+2+3 which is 800mtr more than ADR1+2. Vapp shown in both cases works out to Vref+10. Without BUSS.you will fly attitude and thrust and not speed.
EFB gives landing distance separately for ADR 1+2 and ADR1+2+3 which is 800mtr more than ADR1+2. Vapp shown in both cases works out to Vref+10. Without BUSS.you will fly attitude and thrust and not speed.
