Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Chemtrail generator on BA A350-100 producing visible chemtrails

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Chemtrail generator on BA A350-100 producing visible chemtrails

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd November 2019 | 21:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 137
From: USA
Chemtrail generator on BA A350-100 producing visible chemtrails

Hi all,

I saw this youtube video at 10:43, where the chemicals from new chemtrail generator on this A350-1000 are visible from the cabin. In other aircraft, the chemicals are not visible from the cabin. They don’t become visible until a bit aft of the aircraft (presumably so as not to alert the passengers).

Is there something about the design of the new chemtrail generators that causes this? Are other modern generators producing visible chemtrails so close to the aircraft?

Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2019 | 22:14
  #2 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 15
From: Isla Grande
Originally Posted by Check Airman
Hi all,

I saw this youtube video at 10:43, where the chemicals from new chemtrail generator on this A350-1000 are visible from the cabin. In other aircraft, the chemicals are not visible from the cabin. They don’t become visible until a bit aft of the aircraft (presumably so as not to alert the passengers).

Is there something about the design of the new chemtrail generators that causes this? Are other modern generators producing visible chemtrails so close to the aircraft?

https://youtu.be/DNa_hkyTqWo?t=635
The Chemtrail Generators on A350 are more or less the same like on all modern aircraft. What I have learned is BP had million gallons of bad chemical fluid which get "foggy" immediatly after leaving the nozzles, but they are working on this problem.



gearlever is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2019 | 23:50
  #3 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 371
Likes: 17
From: UK
*Obligatory something about Boeings not having this problem*

Apparently there's a temporary workaround in the offing that involves adjusting the mixer gallery outflow valves, but I'm not an Airbus driver so perhaps someone will come along with a more accurate description.
Sepp is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 00:10
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,179
Likes: 1,111
From: UK
Thumbs up

It's deliberate.
Airbus have been working with the ICA for some time on more efficient nano technolgy to even out the spread and create more effective 'trails.

Thank God for the ICA. Dimmer skies for a brighter future.
TURIN is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 00:37
  #5 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 15
From: Isla Grande
Inside an A350 chemtrailer with politicians.



gearlever is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 04:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Germany




Airbus vice Boeing Chemtrail implementations.
VinRouge is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 18:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 326
Likes: 4
From: Omnipresent
Guys, you really shouldn’t be posting about this on the public forum. I’m sure the mods will be along shortly to move it to the secure side...
NZScion is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 18:58
  #8 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 15
From: Isla Grande
Originally Posted by NZScion
Guys, you really shouldn’t be posting about this on the public forum. I’m sure the mods will be along shortly to move it to the secure side...
Too late, it's already on wikileaks....
gearlever is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 19:49
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 86
From: N/A
Ha-ha - top banter guys!
student88 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 19:57
  #10 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 15
From: Isla Grande
Looking for a Job?



gearlever is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 21:39
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
Oh my.. I've not laughed so much!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 23:52
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 97
From: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
A new thronomister, I recommend the newer Mk 2, should fix this problem.

The new Mk2 makes the trail appear to 'break' occasionally, thus extending the range and therefore the effect...….

Best Inhaling.
Cheeerrrsss…. Griffo
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2019 | 23:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Living with consequences
I once flew with a capt. who would save 6 months of his family’s urine and then add it to the tanks just like the ones in post #5.
Then he would wait until evening civil twilight and when the suns rays spilled over the horizon it gave his chemtrails a breathtaking golden hue.
The man was genius.
Emmit Stussy is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2019 | 07:02
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 4
From: England
Personally I reckon this tech will be obsolete soon with the deployment of the new orbital mind control lasers. Juat another nail in the coffin for the aviation industry. expect more downwards pressure on Ts and Cs soon
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2019 | 07:39
  #15 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 132
Likes: 31
From: Middle East
Guys, this chemtrail business will never compete with the industry that is putting !!!! into the the food supply. I therefore am quitting.
RudderTrimZero is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2019 | 10:11
  #16 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,447
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
How come my little 737s and 727s didn't have all this cool gear as standard fit kit ?
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2019 | 10:28
  #17 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 15
From: Isla Grande
Originally Posted by john_tullamarine
How come my little 737s and 727s didn't have all this cool gear as standard fit kit ?
I'm afraid they are a little bit outdated or too heavy to carry all the tanks, pipes and nozzles.

@ Capt Pit Bull
I agree, now "they" will use the deadly 5G technology for super mind control and climate change.
Much more efficient than HAARP btw.
gearlever is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2019 | 12:35
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Tana
You bastards, you got me! I just came from "a.nother forum" where they were seriously discussing Boeing NMA, NSA, and now FSA... And then I come here and... DAMN! It's not even April 1!!!!
UltraFan is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2019 | 16:45
  #19 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Nirvana..HAHA..just kidding but,if you can tell me where it is!
Ultra Fan,
Please don't trash a serious discussion!!
This is a bigger issue than Brexit for many people..mostly in northern Italy,.and members of my extended family!!
Yaw String is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2019 | 22:32
  #20 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Asia
all of that assuming the earth was round
MD83FO is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.