Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B777 Air Demand Pump Inop.

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B777 Air Demand Pump Inop.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th October 2019 | 21:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Island
B777 Air Demand Pump Inop.

Dispatched with a center hydraulic air demand pump inop., MEL 29-11-03. The procedure required us to power the remaining ADP with the APU bleed for take-off by running the APU bleed and isolating the pump air supply with the L and R bleed isolate valves. After take off the APU was shut down and the bleed isolate valves are returned to their normal open positions.

This makes sense as it allows the remaining pump to provide hydraulic power for the gear retraction and flight controls (I believe primarily the TAC control of the rudder) in the event of an engine failure. What surprised us was that we were not required to re-configure the system for landing, What is different about a single engine go around than an engine out take off?

Any insight greatly appreciated.
Cropduster.
Cropduster is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2019 | 22:14
  #2 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1,123
From: UK
A guess, less fuel on board so engine power not so critical.
TURIN is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2019 | 01:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,766
Likes: 424
From: GA, USA
I’m thinking Maximum Landing Weight.
Significantly less then Maximum Take Off Weight.
B2N2 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2019 | 02:39
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 1
From: home @ 103E
Raising the gear with hydraulics, lowering it by gravity?
perantau is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2019 | 06:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
I'm pretty sure that configuration requirement is driven by critical takeoff rudder response requirements rather than climb performance (gear retraction time).
Dave Therhino is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2019 | 07:51
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 285
From: Moved beyond
Originally Posted by Cropduster
What is different about a single engine go around than an engine out take off?
As Dave Therhino said:
I'm pretty sure that configuration requirement is driven by critical takeoff rudder response requirements...
The immediate rudder response in the event of an engine failure during take-off is more critical than the go-around case. The remaining pumps provide sufficient response in the go-around case, without the need to use APU bleed for the operative C system ADP.

BuzzBox is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2019 | 10:36
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Island
Dave, Buzz Box et all, thank you. There was a lot of head scratching about that on the flight.
Cheers Cropduster.
Cropduster is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.