Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Why need Toga for taking off after deiceing.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Why need Toga for taking off after deiceing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th May 2019, 06:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why need Toga for taking off after deiceing.

Is there any reason why we need toga power to take off after the deiceing procedure?
hollocapwll is offline  
Old 9th May 2019, 12:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to ask your company, it's not a regulatory requirement.
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 9th May 2019, 13:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
De-icing fluid on the aircraft is a contaminant which can change the aircraft takeoff performance. Test flights many years ago (early 737 ?) indicated that the loss of performance was not significant with respect to the margins in the performance calculations.
A few years ago with the introduction of ‘thicker’ type 4 fluids, created unforeseen problems with ‘gelling’ or dry out because the wing voids retained residual fluid. As part of these investigations, test flights indicated that the performance loss of some aircraft would be higher than previously assumed due to the fluid remaining on the wing much longer. Thus additional procedures were required.
Also, for some aircraft types flight handling characteristics changed, which required special procedures, configuration, or performance.

#1 does not give the aircraft type, thus the use of TOGA could be type specific, either for performance reasons or flight handling.
From memory turboprops had more restrictions than jets.
This question might also be connected with no flex power on contaminated runways.


PEI_3721 is offline  
Old 10th May 2019, 10:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,993
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Contaminated runway perhaps?

requiring TOGA or Derate.....

FLX not allowed.

( Airbus )
ACMS is offline  
Old 10th May 2019, 12:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: blue planet
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PEI_3721
De-icing fluid on the aircraft is a contaminant which can change the aircraft takeoff performance. Test flights many years ago (early 737 ?) indicated that the loss of performance was not significant with respect to the margins in the performance calculations.
A few years ago with the introduction of ‘thicker’ type 4 fluids, created unforeseen problems with ‘gelling’ or dry out because the wing voids retained residual fluid. As part of these investigations, test flights indicated that the performance loss of some aircraft would be higher than previously assumed due to the fluid remaining on the wing much longer. Thus additional procedures were required.
Also, for some aircraft types flight handling characteristics changed, which required special procedures, configuration, or performance.

#1 does not give the aircraft type, thus the use of TOGA could be type specific, either for performance reasons or flight handling.
From memory turboprops had more restrictions than jets.
This question might also be connected with no flex power on contaminated runways.


It has been a while.. Do some types need higher speeds for takeoff after deicing? (deicing speeds) e.g Do328?

The Old Swedish is offline  
Old 10th May 2019, 13:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Old Swedish
It has been a while.. Do some types need higher speeds for takeoff after deicing? (deicing speeds) e.g Do328?
Yes, Principally aircraft with lower than typical jet rotation speeds. Because the fluid flow-off characteristics are determined with a generic speed ramp test (but ul;timately tracing back to the 737-200 ADV!), and pass/fail for a fluid is based on that acceleration profile, any aircraft that falls significantly below that profile may fail to shed fluids as "normal" and may need more speed, either to promote more shedding or to compensate for the failure to shed, or both.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 10th May 2019, 20:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: at the edge of the alps
Posts: 448
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hollocapwll
Is there any reason why we need toga power to take off after the deiceing procedure?
Most probably because the manufacturer did not provide performance data for flex takeoffs after de-icing. Or the operator wants to ensure a certain performance margin.
Alpine Flyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.