Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Performance query

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Performance query

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Aug 2002, 18:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ADN345/17dme,ish
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Performance query

Can someone confirm what happens to your MTOW and V1 with an increased clearway.
Which is more efficient in the cruise, forward or aft C of G.
Finally, are stators divergent or convergent
Thanks.
Chokdee is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2002, 08:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very good question.

I believe that an increased clearway will lead to an increased MTOW but will also lead to a lower V1.

Lets start by the definition as always...

TODA = RWY LENGTH + FULL CLEARWAY

Therefore if clearway increases, the TODA will increase as well thus allowing a higher TOW.

However, assuming that the RWY length is unchanged, a lower V1 improves the stopping distance on the RWY.
It should be appreciated that using 50 meters of clearway and lowering V1 just 1 knot is enough to raise the TOW by almost 500 kg (source taken from the book "Aerodynamics for Airline Pilots"; exemple from a DC-9).

In conclusion, if you have a long stopway, V1 can be increased but in the other hand, if you have a long clearway, V1 can be reduced.

For your other question, I don't know...
I have to go back in my library and dig into the books.
Will let you know if I find something.

Cheers.
Bigmosquito is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2002, 08:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aft C of G generally, but TOO far aft, not good.

Opps, forgot to add, applies to sub-sonic aeroplanes.

Last edited by 411A; 5th Aug 2002 at 09:04.
411A is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2002, 08:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aft of CG is correct. It lowers the drag...

Concerning the stator. I guess you are talking about engine...
They are of course convergent.
The 2 basic elements of the turbine assembly, stator and rotor.
The stator, or turbine guide vanes serve two functions.

The first function is to discharge the gas at as high speed as possible. The vanes accomplish this because the individual blades are contoured and placed at such angle so as to form what is effectively a series of small nozzles.
As the air flows through this restricted area, a portion of the gases heat and pressure energy is converted to kinetic energy that is further converted to mechanical energy when the air passes over the rotor blades.
At the same time, because the turbine guide vanes are set at a specific angle, the second function is accomplished, which is aiming the gas-flow at the rotors in the most effective manner
(source taken from "Advanced Aircraft Systems" by David Lombardo).

Hope it answers your questions...

Cheers.
Bigmosquito is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2002, 12:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: S Warwickshire
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is an increase in area and a drop in static pressure as you pass through the stators, so they are divergent.

Their main purpose as I understand it, is to take out swirl from the previous stage and align the flow with the next rotor stage.
The amount of expansion is small compared to the rotor where work is extracted as the flow expands.
Mark 1 is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2002, 16:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina, USA, Planet Earth
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aren't stators used in both the compressor and turbine stages of many engines? If that is the case, I'd expect a compressor stator to be convergent, and a turbine stator to be divergent.
lunkenheimer is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2002, 18:06
  #7 (permalink)  
m&v
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: delta.bc.canada
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bigmosquito,don't reduce the V1 too much with the clearway credit.
Balanced(old fashioned now),used to be the same distance to Acc/stop,as go' to the 35' screen at the end of the 'dry' runway.
With the credit of the clearway,and providing one could still stop on the concrete,one was allowed to increase the Towt.
Wet'conditions introduced the 'reduced 'V1(to enable the A/craft to stop,at the same weight,on the runway.The 15' screen,was a compromise,to allow the a/craft to go!!!!.
The present quandary ,is that the 15'screen is at the end of the clearway(JAR25.111).In reality one crosses the 'end' of the concrete at about 8/9'
m&v is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2002, 18:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dorset
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chokdee,

Your questions suggest that you are preparing for the JAR ATPL exams. The answers below are based on the "conventional wisdom" required for those exams.

INCREASED CLEARWAY
The effect of an increased clearway depends on what exactly is limiting your mtow. If it is the ASDA or TORA, then the extra clearway might have little or no effect. Remember you have to get from V1 to VR and VLOf within a specified fraction of the TORA, as well as reaching at least V2 by the end of the TODA. You really nead to look carefuly at the question to see what kind of situation the examiners have in mind. The clues are often in the options, rather than the question itself.


C OF G POSITION
The entire allowable C of G range is in front of the neutral point. The futher forwad we move the C of G the greater will be the tail down force required to keep the nose up. This increases the stalling speed and trim drag. So range goes down, as C oF G moves forward. It does however make the aircraft more stable.

Moving the C of G aft within the allowable range reduces the need for tailplane down force, so the trim darg and stalling speed reduce and range increases. But stability decreases.


STATORS
In an axial flow compressor both the stators and rotors form divergent ducts. The rotation of the rotors accelerates the air, while the divergent ducts between the rotor blades decelerates and compresses it. The overall efect is that airflow velocity goes up in the rotors and down again in the stators. The pressure and temperature go up both in the rotors and in the stators.

TURBINES
The shape of the ducts between the stator blades depends on the type of turbine.

In a pure inpulse turbine the ducts between the blades are convergent in the stators and parallel in the rotors. This is because impulse turbine rotors extract energy by changing the direction of the airflow.

In a pure reaction type turbine the opposite is true. The ducts in the stators are parallel and those in the rotors are convergent. This is because the rotors in reaction turbines extract energy by accelerating the gas. It most not go supersonic, so we really don't want it to be going too fast when it enters the rotors.

In a real gas turbine engine the turbines are a combination of impulse and reaction. They tend to be mainly impulse at the blade roots and mainly reaction at the tips. So the ducts between the stator blades are convergent at the roots and parallel(ish) at the tips. This is the type of turbine the examiners mean when they ask about an "impulse root turbine".
Keith.Williams. is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.