Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

JFK 22L TERPS Minima

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

JFK 22L TERPS Minima

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st March 2019 | 20:02
  #1 (permalink)  
RMC
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 2
From: Sutton
JFK 22L TERPS Minima

As a foreign operator fairly new to the USA can someone enlighten me as to whether the 50’ for a CDFA approach needs to be added to the TERPS minima for 22L of 440’ . We don’t add for RNP approaches to LNAV / VNAV minima but do add 50’ if flying to LNAV minima...neither of these appear on the associated US plates?
RMC is offline  
Reply
Old 31st March 2019 | 20:30
  #2 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 180
From: USA
Originally Posted by RMC
As a foreign operator fairly new to the USA can someone enlighten me as to whether the 50’ for a CDFA approach needs to be added to the TERPS minima for 22L of 440’ . We don’t add for RNP approaches to LNAV / VNAV minima but do add 50’ if flying to LNAV minima...neither of these appear on the associated US plates?
Short answer:
MDA/H add 50.
DA/H don't add.

Long answer:
If the minimum is a "decision" altitude you don't add the 50'. If the minimum is a "descend" altitude, but you fly using CDFA, you add the 50'. This is because while you decide to go missed on an ILS or CDFA you are still descending, while if you are level at the MDA you are not.

Don't have the plate, but hope this helps.
hans brinker is offline  
Reply
Old 31st March 2019 | 22:30
  #3 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 30
From: Texas
As Hans said, if it says DH treat it like an ILS or CDFA , otherwise it's a MDA and add 50 feet. It's actually a bit more complicated but that may be airline specific. In my airline's authorizations from the FAA we are allowed to treat the MDA for an ILS approach with the GS inop as a DH. Or if there is a note on the approach plate that authorized operators can use the MDA as a DH. I spent 5 minutes looking at a lot of the larger airports in the USA. I was (1) surprised how few non RNAV non precision approaches are left in service and (2) could not find any with the ball note.

I remember from years past we were also authorized to treat the MDA as a DH if the runway had a PAPI/VASI or if the runway had a precision approach even if we were not flying that approach. Those authorizations have gone away.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Reply
Old 31st March 2019 | 23:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: shiny side up
whether the 50’ for a CDFA approach
The 50' is a minimum (for both MDA AND DA/H). Most find they need to add more than a 50' momentary descent to avoid busting the surface.

Last edited by Smythe; 1st April 2019 at 00:55.
Smythe is offline  
Reply
Old 1st April 2019 | 10:11
  #5 (permalink)  
RMC
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 2
From: Sutton
So TERPS is no different to EU LAND we treat these approaches as CDFA to plate LNAV minima and add 50’ to MDA minima for TERPS MDA of 440 also becomes 490’. Thanks
RMC is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.