Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Max: CG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th March 2019 | 10:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Wengen
Max: CG

Not sure if this has been covered.
Is the Max's new CG giving W & B problems à la A321/A346?
*
Winnerhofer is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2019 | 05:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: WA STATE
Originally Posted by Winnerhofer
Not sure if this has been covered.
Is the Max's new CG giving W & B problems à la A321/A346?
*
NO NO NO
Please read seattletimes article

https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...ion-air-crash/
CONSO is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2019 | 07:57
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,731
Likes: 2,105
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by Winnerhofer
Not sure if this has been covered.
Is the Max's new CG giving W & B problems à la A321/A346?
Some carriers have reportedly encountered W&B limitations on the 737NG too, because of the nature of their operation.

PPRuNe: Ryanair Weight and Balance Issues?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2019 | 09:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: FL410
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Some carriers have reportedly encountered W&B limitations on the 737NG too, because of the nature of their operation.

PPRuNe: Ryanair Weight and Balance Issues?
Referring to a post from a decade ago, since then procedures have changed a lot, as has this airline...
Skyjob is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2019 | 13:35
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,731
Likes: 2,105
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by Skyjob
Referring to a post from a decade ago, since then procedures have changed a lot, as has this airline...
Yes, I'd be surprised if 10 years wasn't enough time to develop a workaround. The aircraft itself hasn't changed, of course.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 19th March 2019 | 09:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: FL410
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Yes, I'd be surprised if 10 years wasn't enough time to develop a workaround. The aircraft itself hasn't changed, of course.
Think what the problem was in those days was the free seating policy, creating a situation where weight would invariably shift forward.
Added to that the baggage policy to load bags in hold 2 in front of wings, adding to a nose heavy scenario.
With longer flights, more centre fuel required, CG moves forward, resulting in a pile up of forward weights.
The weight and balance limits were further limited by company to create an artificial additional safety layer, many companies do this, just compare FPPM cg envelope vs OMB published.
Skyjob is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.