Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Laser Landing Lights

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Laser Landing Lights

Old 14th Feb 2019, 02:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 806
Laser Landing Lights

https://www.sldlaser.com/why-laserlight

Will [email protected] light technology migrate to aircraft in the near future.

They appear smaller than LED, brighter than LED (much brighter) and lower power consumption.

Is there any technical reason why they coundn't be fitted to an aircraft via STC.
nomorecatering is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2019, 03:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 609
Maybe. But the characteristics of a [email protected] don't seem to fit well with that of landing lights.

Spatial coherence: Able to focus into a tight beam with minimum spread. But you want some beam spread with landing lights. Both to illuminate an area instead of a point. And to be visible by other aircraft over a wider area.

Narrow spectrum: OK for anti-collision beacons and red/green navigation lights. But landing lights are white. Or at least broad enough spectrum so you can get some return from various different tinted surfaces.

[email protected] efficiency might have developed beyond that available from other technologies, including LEDs. They might work in much the same way as white LEDs do. A blue or UV LED exciting a phosphor layer to produce white light.
EEngr is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2019, 08:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,040
Click the link in #1

Very impressive and interesting.
Uplinker is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2019, 10:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: FL410
Posts: 807
No concerns about flying towards an aircraft with its landing lights on flying towards you?
I think if the brightness is as quoted (100x) then there are some serious safety issues to address.
Not for the operating crew, who benefit from this new brilliant light, but for all the other crews out there that have to see them fly.

Note: there isa. safety reason why people shining [email protected] lights at aircraft get sentenced and go to prison, how can we enforce that when we use [email protected] ourselves?
Skyjob is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2019, 11:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wilds of Warwickshire
Posts: 146
One thing to get on record on this Thread is that [email protected] Spotlights do NOT put out [email protected] beams.

The (multiple) [email protected] beams are shone on a Lens containing (I think) phosphorus. That then becomes fluorescent and produces the ‘beam’.

The points about the high intensity are of course still valid. Cars equipped with them have auto-dipping, difficult on an aircraft.
KiloB is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2019, 13:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,228
Very interesting. It took some time (15-20 years) for LED technology to become the de facto standard. This may not catch on for a while. [email protected] lights sound cool though, if nothing else.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2019, 19:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,065
IIRC, BMW has [email protected] headlights available on some of its models in Europe. With the proper lenses and/or reflectors, they need not be any more dangerous than high-power LED lights.
Intruder is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2019, 20:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 40
Posts: 508
Both BMW and Audi offer [email protected] lights on some of their top-range models, a technology which was developed by Audi for endurance racing in LMP1 prototypes. The main reason for the effort was that they provide better illumination and longer range than xenon or LED lights, as well as allowing for some very fancy features. For example, if they're on 'high beam' and encounter an object, the lights will only be dimmed where they reach the object, while the remaining illuminated area will still be on high-beam.
SMT Member is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2019, 08:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,040
Originally Posted by SMT Member View Post
..............For example, if they're on 'high beam' and encounter an object, the lights will only be dimmed where they reach the object, while the remaining illuminated area will still be on high-beam.
Any idea how it does this - by which I mean how does it ‘see’ and ‘know about’ the object? I guess there must be a light sensor in the headlight which detects the backscatter of light reflections from objects, and uses this to modulate the outgoing beam?


Uplinker is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2019, 09:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 1,173
With the intensity of these things being able to light up a runway for hundreds of meters then the next logical step would be make them swivel so that optimal luminance along the runway can be maintained throughout all phases of take-off/landing preventing bright spots on the ground and/or shining them pointlessly into the sky.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2019, 07:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 938
Landing lights and car headlights just don't need to be any brighter! They are too intense already. So use the technology to reduce power requirements and increase MTBF while maintaining an appropriate level of brightness. If you're looking at an excessively bright area on the runway, (or road) then the surrounding less-well-lit areas become all but invisible. An appropriate level of illumination allows adequate lighting of the area of concern without blinding oneself or others to an unnecessary degree.

And those blueish car headlights make me want to return the favor with carbon arc searchlights!

Just my personal opinion on the matter.
westhawk is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2019, 20:54
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 196
A lot of the problems people have with bright car headlamps are due to after-market High Intensity Discharge lamps which are poorly installed. That's why the UK Government has banned after-market conversions that are problematic ( https://www.gov.uk/government/public...-hid-headlamps ). I think we can all be confident that any aircraft or landing lights would not come with problems of after-market bodgers modifying the light pattern to look fashionable. There are also regional variations in lighting design, in particular the UK requires lights to be dipped (so the main illumination has a minimum upper cut-off angle of 0.5 degrees down ) while the USA only requires a horizontal cut-off. This often makes US-specfication lights appear brighter for the same lighting power.

The "Laser" lights are not a [email protected] shining directly onto the road (and therefore into your eyes). Here's a manufacturer's technical description (may contain self-congratulatory prose):
https://www.osram.com/am/specials/tr...logy/index.jsp
The main point is that they use a blue [email protected] LED to illuminate a "converter" (what I suspect others might call a phosphor, as also used to "convert" UV light to a wide spectrum of visible light in a fluorescent tube) to produce a white light. They reckon that they can get higher lighting power by doing this than by generating the white light in a white LED as at present.
nicolai is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2019, 22:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 302
What's the point of having high beams if they don't illuminate objects?
Chu Chu is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2019, 22:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Earth
Posts: 15
Originally Posted by Uplinker View Post
Any idea how it does this - by which I mean how does it ‘see’ and ‘know about’ the object?
Using the camera on the windscreen and image recognition algorithms.
delarue is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2019, 22:42
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Earth
Posts: 15
Originally Posted by Chu Chu View Post
What's the point of having high beams if they don't illuminate objects?
By "objects", the previous poster meant other cars. You can see them because they carry their own set of lights.
delarue is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2019, 00:51
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 938
Good things overdone often become bad things.

Many of these high illumination lighting systems are simply overdone for the purpose they are meant to serve. Just because it's newer and better in some ways doesn't necessarily mean it's better in all respects. I do appreciate that they are more power efficient and last longer though.
westhawk is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2019, 14:02
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 196
Heat dissipation is a major issue in LEDs. Incandescent lights can just radiate it away because the heat transfer at the incandescent filament temperature is good. If you run a white LED junction at high power you have issues with it melting itself, and the maximum temperature is low enough that you have heat transport issues trying to move the heat energy away from the LED before the LED temperature gets too high.

That's why single-LED lights tend not to come in very high power, instead you have to have an array of LEDs. Really high power LED stage lights have large arrays of lights, and if you need a very bright point-like source then a high intensity discharge or specialist filament light is still the way to go.

Therefore greater efficiency in the LED light generation, via such things as these "Laser" lights can up the single-LED lighting power without having to get into arranging, cooling, powering, and focusing an LED array. That leads to some major design advantages even if you are just trying to achieve the equivalent lighting effects of an incandescent Xenon lamp.

Now, if you are trying to use the same power with LED as with incandescent you can get some truly amazing brightness, as in some stage lights that are 8 to 10 times brighter than their incandescent predecessors for the same size package and power consumption. They're a bit nuts.
nicolai is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.