Block Altitude clearances
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: alaska
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Block Altitude clearances
Hi can anyone share with me the regulatoons for block altitude clearances between FAA and Air Services Australia.
What are the threats associated with it and if anyone has any material on block altitudes.
thanks
wilco
What are the threats associated with it and if anyone has any material on block altitudes.
thanks
wilco
There are no CFR 14 regulations regarding block altitudes in the FAA system. If you flew outside of your cleared altitudes you could be subject to a violation like any clearance. The Instrument Pilot Handbook and the Air Traffic Control order simply say it is a block of altitudes assigned by ATC to allow altitude deviations. The IPH also suggests requesting a block if you are unable to maintain altitude due to turbulence.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between supple thighs
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Australian AIP has the following guidance,
6.8 Block Level Clearances
6.8.1 Subject to traffic, ATC may issue block level clearances to facilitate operations in adverse weather or to allow flight crews to optimise fuel burn for an aircraft.
6.8.2 A block level clearance is cancelled or amended by the issuing of a new vertical clearance.
6.8.3 To request a cancellation of a block clearance when it is no longer required, flight crews should downlink a CPDLC request for the preferred level in order to enable ATC to issue the new vertical clearance.
6.8 Block Level Clearances
6.8.1 Subject to traffic, ATC may issue block level clearances to facilitate operations in adverse weather or to allow flight crews to optimise fuel burn for an aircraft.
6.8.2 A block level clearance is cancelled or amended by the issuing of a new vertical clearance.
6.8.3 To request a cancellation of a block clearance when it is no longer required, flight crews should downlink a CPDLC request for the preferred level in order to enable ATC to issue the new vertical clearance.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What are the threats associated with it ...
There are no CFR 14 regulations regarding block altitudes in the FAA system. If you flew outside of your cleared altitudes you could be subject to a violation like any clearance. The Instrument Pilot Handbook and the Air Traffic Control order simply say it is a block of altitudes assigned by ATC to allow altitude deviations. The IPH also suggests requesting a block if you are unable to maintain altitude due to turbulence.
Not quite so, refer to a "Cruise" clearance, this is a block altitude clearance of a particularly flexible king, see the FAA AIM and the Pilot/Controller Glossary.
Tootle pip!!
There are also no regulations about cruise clearances. A cruise clearance is different from a block altitude clearance in that it includes an approach clearance and once you report descending out of an altitude you can't go back up to that altitude. Those differences are pointed out in the AIM which says in its preface that it is not regulatory. So if a pilot failed to comply with the conditions of a cruise clearance they would be violating 91.123 and not some cruise clearance regulation. In 40+ years of IFR flying I've only received a cruise clearance one time between Maui and Kona in the middle of the night.
Block Altitude clearances are often given in both New Zealand and Australian FIRs . Before RVSM they were a great way of stating close to optimum ALT . With RVSM if the airspace is empty enough to allow a block clearance, it empty enough to allow you to cruise within 1000 feet of optimum, which is probably good enough .
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not a cruise clearance, exactly, but a former employer had a nightly mail run from Anchorage to Fairbanks. IIRC, we'd typically arrive in Fairbanks about 10 pm or so. More than once We'd check in with Fairbanks approach and get: "Cleared Visual Approach Rwy 1L, Cleared to Land, Cleared to taxi to parking". Saved a lot of wear and tear on the radios.
Not a cruise clearance, exactly, but a former employer had a nightly mail run from Anchorage to Fairbanks. IIRC, we'd typically arrive in Fairbanks about 10 pm or so. More than once We'd check in with Fairbanks approach and get: "Cleared Visual Approach Rwy 1L, Cleared to Land, Cleared to taxi to parking". Saved a lot of wear and tear on the radios.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: london
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have had block clearances across the US a couple of times - asked for and was given a block FL430-FL490 - and its great. I love flying in America. Your beer is crap but your sky is big..
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Block altitudes are a good option. They can also help when you're trying to find the best ride through an area of turbulence.
Join Date: Jun 1996
Location: Check with Ops
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1,400 breweries in England vs. 6,300 in the U.S. If you didn't find a beer to your liking you should have keep looking.
There are also no regulations about cruise clearances. A cruise clearance is different from a block altitude clearance in that it includes an approach clearance and once you report descending out of an altitude you can't go back up to that altitude. Those differences are pointed out in the AIM which says in its preface that it is not regulatory. So if a pilot failed to comply with the conditions of a cruise clearance they would be violating 91.123 and not some cruise clearance regulation. In 40+ years of IFR flying I've only received a cruise clearance one time between Maui and Kona in the middle of the night.
Although it may surprise you, I do/did know that, and you are playing with semantics. It come with too may hours, over too many years, flying in US ( and lots of other) airspace.
There probably isn't an FAR that says many brown Burmese cats you can carry on a N- freighter, but that doesn't mean you can't carry brown Burmese cats on said freighter.
I seriously suggest you look a little more widely, rather than expecting a specific regulation to allow or prohibit whatever it is you want to do.
ATC, FAA style, is commendably practical and flexible.
The "law" around violating a clearance is also reasonably straightforward, which seems to be your hangup.
Tootle pip!!
PS: Re. the AIM, I would give careful and more in-depth study to the caveats and limitations, if I were you.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just remember that once issued a block altitude all calls to ATC must state the block that you are maintaing, with no reference to your current altitude.
I read recently about the potential of both block altitude and cruise climb availability over the Atlantic. However, given the level of traffic I haven't even dared to ask. Has anyone here done so?
And with regard to cruise climb, I understand that the basic difference between it and a block altitude is that in the former once you climb you can never descend, but are there any other differences?
I read recently about the potential of both block altitude and cruise climb availability over the Atlantic. However, given the level of traffic I haven't even dared to ask. Has anyone here done so?
And with regard to cruise climb, I understand that the basic difference between it and a block altitude is that in the former once you climb you can never descend, but are there any other differences?
Leadsled, This is pprune, the center of the pedantic universe. I could have told the OP the regulation regarding block altitude clearances is the same as for a fixed altitude. You have to abide by it. A block altitude clearance is normally at the request of the flight crew due to weather or maneuvering. A cruise clearance is issued by ATC in lieu of a fixed altitude. I look at them as two totally different things.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just remember that once issued a block altitude all calls to ATC must state the block that you are maintaing, with no reference to your current altitude.
I read recently about the potential of both block altitude and cruise climb availability over the Atlantic. However, given the level of traffic I haven't even dared to ask. Has anyone here done so?
And with regard to cruise climb, I understand that the basic difference between it and a block altitude is that in the former once you climb you can never descend, but are there any other differences?
I read recently about the potential of both block altitude and cruise climb availability over the Atlantic. However, given the level of traffic I haven't even dared to ask. Has anyone here done so?
And with regard to cruise climb, I understand that the basic difference between it and a block altitude is that in the former once you climb you can never descend, but are there any other differences?
Note.— Avoid use of this message element due to potential misinterpretation
As ATM tools improve they are becoming more capable of deconflicting aircraft on cruise climb and some authorities namely NAV Canada are more approachable on cruise climb than others some will not even countenance the idea. So that is why aircraft are given step climbs that approximate to a cruise climb but in a series of level segments. Not ideal as the engines are required to accelerate to climb power for the climb between level segments and are really only at maximum efficiency for part of each level cruise leg. [Note that when looking at the efficiency of cruise climb you need to include the potential energy gained over the cruise climb duration and its release as kinetic energy in the descent. Do not just look at the fuel flow during the cruise climb.]
As more airspace becomes 'free route' and allows 'business trajectories' that do not follow route structures (. e.g the North Atlantic OTS is due to disappear very soon.) expect the support tools for the controllers to be improved so the procedural block clearances will become less necessary. So brush up on engine performance in the cruise you can save a lot of fuel.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: london
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I have been issued a block clearance I use the phrase in the block FL430-490 and don’t refer to my current altitude. I don’t really know if that’s exactly right but I copied it from an American pilot I flew with (super bloke even though he later voted for Trump) and it seems to work. I have only ever been given block altitudes in European airspace by military controllers when conducting air tests, never for enroute.
I would like to add that American beer is not so bad that I refuse to drink it - I would simply like to find a pint of Hobgoblin or Bishops Finger in a bar in downtown LA one night. It would make me happy..
I would like to add that American beer is not so bad that I refuse to drink it - I would simply like to find a pint of Hobgoblin or Bishops Finger in a bar in downtown LA one night. It would make me happy..
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I have been issued a block clearance I use the phrase in the block FL430-490 and don’t refer to my current altitude. I don’t really know if that’s exactly right but I copied it from an American pilot I flew with (super bloke even though he later voted for Trump) and it seems to work. I have only ever been given block altitudes in European airspace by military controllers when conducting air tests, never for enroute.
In FAA land, the specified phraseology for issuing a block clearance is: MAINTAIN BLOCK (altitude) THROUGH (altitude) So I use pretty much that "Maintaining Block 10,000 through 14,000" "IN the Block XXX-YYY" is common too. Agree that it's best not to report the specific altitude you're occupying at the time, and It could lead to misunderstanding if the block altitude clearance is forgotten or not passed on to a subsequent controller.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In FAA land, the specified phraseology for issuing a block clearance is: MAINTAIN BLOCK (altitude) THROUGH (altitude) So I use pretty much that "Maintaining Block 10,000 through 14,000" "IN the Block XXX-YYY" is common too. Agree that it's best not to report the specific altitude you're occupying at the time, and It could lead to misunderstanding if the block altitude clearance is forgotten or not passed on to a subsequent controller.