Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Dimensional Analysis on Lift Equation not working out?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Dimensional Analysis on Lift Equation not working out?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Oct 2018, 18:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dimensional Analysis on Lift Equation not working out?

Hello,

I am showing that the equation for lift on a wing is
L=1/2 Cl (air density) (Area of Wing) Velocity^2

However, the dimensions aren't working out.

L is kg ; Cl is dimensionless; Air density is kg/m^3; Area is m^2; Velocity is m/s

If you work the dimensions it does not work out. You get L in kg and kg m on the other side.

What am I missing?

Thanks.
aviationluver is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2018, 19:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aviationluver
Hello,

I am showing that the equation for lift on a wing is
L=1/2 Cl (air density) (Area of Wing) Velocity^2

However, the dimensions aren't working out.

L is kg ; Cl is dimensionless; Air density is kg/m^3; Area is m^2; Velocity is m/s

If you work the dimensions it does not work out. You get L in kg and kg m on the other side.

What am I missing?

Thanks.
First you are missing (1/s)^2 from the velocity term, this gives kg*m /s^2

Second, you are missing that lift is a force so it is in Newtons which is also (e.g. from F=ma) = kg*m/s^2

Sorry you didn't discover new physics, maybe next time
infrequentflyer789 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2018, 19:52
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just realized that. No need for the insult.
aviationluver is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2018, 11:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aviationluver
No need for the insult.
Is this the new generation of pilots?

I need to start sorting out my affairs.
Derfred is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2018, 12:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by infrequentflyer789
First you are missing (1/s)^2 from the velocity term, this gives kg*m /s^2

Second, you are missing that lift is a force so it is in Newtons which is also (e.g. from F=ma) = kg*m/s^2

Sorry you didn't discover new physics, maybe next time
I get the joke, like "new math".
FakePilot is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 13:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Redhill, Surrey, or another planet
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To add to the tongue-in-cheek ‘new physics’, I’m glad Newton got there first. Imagine force’s being measured in Aviationluvers or Infrequentflyer789s
VintageEngineer is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 14:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had this one landing last trip that I think was because of New Physics...
Vessbot is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 14:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blighty (Nth. Downs)
Age: 77
Posts: 2,107
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by VintageEngineer
...Imagine force’s being measured in Aviationluvers or Infrequentflyer789s
Didn't realise Newton was a grocer...
Chris Scott is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2018, 11:33
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure if he was a grocer but I always think of apple's when I think of Newton.

Back to topic, the OP isn't the first person to have a "brain fart" and mix up mass and force in an equation.
Crabman is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2018, 12:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,644
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
I was confused when I was first saw that the dimensions of a force are M.L.T^-2

However, it’s obvious when you look at F = m.a
India Four Two is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.