Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Enroute Separation

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Enroute Separation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th September 2018 | 06:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: All over
Enroute Separation

A buddy of mine got asked an interesting question during a check flight. They were in the cruise at FL340 with traffic ahead of them on the same airway and 2000 feet above. The checker asked him if they had adequate separation to request a climb to the same level. My facetious response would likely have been "let's ask and find out!"

It got me thinking though. What separation do ATC use when allocating cruising levels on airways? Also, what separation do they use when granting climb/descent through a level occupied by same direction traffic on the same route?

I've done some research and can find figures for oceanic routes using RNAV 10 and RNP 4 airways (50 or 80 nm and 30 nm respectively). But what about routes under radar coverage? If someone could point me in the right direction that would be appreciated.
scrum is offline  
Reply
Old 9th September 2018 | 09:10
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 616
Likes: 57
From: GPS L INVALID
My response would have been the same as yours, what an utterly irrelevant question for a line check! Anyhow, local AIPs usually dictate separation, however doc 4444 lays down the standards - longitudinally 5 NM which may be reduced down to 3 NM if the surveillance capability permits this, or 2.5 on 10 NM final or closer on approach to a runway.
STBYRUD is offline  
Reply
Old 9th September 2018 | 12:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 1
From: 60 north
Hi
Five miles and less speed and diverging on radar heading looks to be the trick. and they are aiming for 10 miles to continue on track. Happens over Paris a lot and northbound entering Brest and Bordeaux FIR after being treated to the excellently flexible Madrid FIR.
Cpt B
BluSdUp is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.