Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

New approaches to noise abatement?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

New approaches to noise abatement?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jul 2002, 16:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New approaches to noise abatement?

I've been thinking about ways in which "aggressive noise" abatement could be used to push forward runway approvals, particularly at LHR. I'd just like to put a few ideas forward. Obviously the new rwy won't be open until at least 2007/8, by which time new technology should contribute to the issue, but for starters:


- The development of a new sub-class of Performance A aircraft (say A2) which would have certain instrumentation, descent/climb characteristics, which would tie with pretty stringent SID/STAR/Approach requirements. Equipment would need to include FPA selection on autopilot (which most acft now have anyway?)
- Approach: 5 degree FPA to c.1500', IGS (a la Kai Tak) to allow varying appoaches, to spread noise burden
- Ban on use of reversers (except for snow, ice, emergency)
- Rolling TO at TOGA/Max power, immediate turn to avoid built up areas or to follow 27R departure path; either climbing turn or 18-20 degree climbout (feasible?)
- Any other possibilities?

I appreciate these seem fairly "hairy" , but if the aircraft have the capability and it contributes to the approval process, why not? Also, are there any other features which could be used? Noise suppressing boundary walls (similar to those at aprons/hangars), any other suggestions?

From a pilot's viewpoint, how aggressive can SIDS/approaches be? Comments?
akerosid is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2002, 19:06
  #2 (permalink)  
m&v
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: delta.bc.canada
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your suggestions aren't newand have certain applications world wide.
The FAA years ago 'explored ' the 2 glideslope concept.Initially a 6degree to Intercept the 3degree about 1000/1500'agl..the application of thrust at the intercept point negated the quiet credit up to that time......The L1011 would be able to comply due to it's unique Direct lift flight controls.
In Canada certain runways suggest/request no reverse thrust -unless required,and in the night operations.
The industry might argue with the requirement for Toga Take offs every time,rolling takeoff's aren't utilized enough as ATC put you in position ,waiting the runway to be cleared.....
Banking after takeoff could be improved upon,Chicago appreciate it with an immediate turn.....
Maybe it's time for an Industry review of your suggestions
m&v is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.