Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Fuel Burn in Turbulence

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Fuel Burn in Turbulence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th May 2018, 01:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Burn in Turbulence

Having been in the situation of having to make a decision between diverting or holding over an airport and waiting for wx to clear I was wondering how accurate are fuel burn estimates when faced with significant turbulence that requires constant and quite large variations in thrust in order to maintain speed.

Should traditional numbers for fuel burn be scraped at this point. Should a margin be added, and if so how much?

Hoping that someone might have some real life experienice regarding this.
Airmann is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 03:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: France
Age: 69
Posts: 1,143
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
How about adding 20%?
eckhard is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 21:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,017
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Cool Fuel Consumption in Turbulence

Vra (rough air) is always less than standard cruise. Also called turbulence penetration speed, this velocity requires less fuel whether selected by pilot hand flying (magenta line notwithstanding) or FADEC established Vmo - maximum operating speed - as long as the aircraft is maintaining or losing altitude. Obviously, climbing to escape turbulence is another story altogether.

- Ed
cavuman1 is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 21:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vra (rough air) is always less than standard cruise. Also called turbulence penetration speed, this velocity requires less fuel whether selected by pilot hand flying (magenta line notwithstanding) or FADEC established Vmo - maximum operating speed - as long as the aircraft is maintaining or losing altitude. Obviously, climbing to escape turbulence is another story altogether.
I have no idea what you are trying to say. It doesn't address the original question if constant thrust changes alters the fuel burn. Rough air speed isn't always less than standard cruise speed. Not on a jetliner anyway.
172_driver is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 23:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,832
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cavuman1
Vra (rough air) is always less than standard cruise. Also called turbulence penetration speed
Guess I learnt something today: I've never heard of or seen Vra!!!! Anyway, the Severe Turbulence checklist on my 380 says to increase (or less likely decrease) to Mach 0.85. So actually I could be increasing speed to maintain a margin between Vls and Vne/Vmo.

The difference in fuel burn is the square root of 0....
White Knight is online now  
Old 15th May 2018, 05:20
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vra or turbulence speed, if I'm not mistaken, has more to do with ensuring that structural loads are kept within limits rather than having anything to do with minimizing fuel burn.

I'm talking here more about holds in terminal airspace. Below around 18,000 ft. And at the standard hold speeds with moderate turbulence or greater.
Airmann is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.