Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Cabin leak rates / decompression

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Cabin leak rates / decompression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 18:46
  #1 (permalink)  
RMC
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cabin leak rates / decompression

Anyone have any information on cabin leak rates in the event of a double pack failure (either flight test cabin altitude rise or ground test maintenance manual pressure drop). In previous threads I have seen cabin altitude rise of between 300 and 2,000 FPM for different types. Apart from door seals, electrical wiring bungs, system Non return valves and flying control cable seals (non FBW) where else would the aircraft leak air?
RMC is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 19:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: UK / FIN
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuselage belly drains, drain masts, some fuselage seams can leak littlebit, windscreens from seals, bad repairs with cherry max rivets if rivet center pin is missing.
How depressing is to find badly leaking aircraft on ground leak rate test... leaks from everywhere.
Corrosion is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 19:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moveable cockpit windows, pitot-static feed throughs come to mind theoretically to add to your list, and practically, the lower fuselage water drains are known leakers and the landing gear wheel wells are common sources of structural air leakage.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 21:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bkk
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you fly up to , say 40,000 feet, turn off both packs, even in a brand new aircraft, typically the outflow valve will drive shut.If you try to open the OV for some reason it cannot be opened usually due to a heavy duty spring resisting this action (failsafe).In one exercise I found that the air leaked out very very slowly (new A/C) and it can take up to 30 minutes before the cabin altitude would reach above 10,000 feet.FWIW
piratepete is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 23:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: United States of Europe
Age: 40
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 out of the factory will have a leakage rate of around 500ft/min, with two packs off. Approximately double that for in-service (older) aircraft.
Leakage rate will be increased significantly in smoke configuration, i.e. blower and extract in OVRD. Around 1800-2000 ft/min for a new a/c.
OPEN DES is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2018, 07:57
  #6 (permalink)  
RMC
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks. One last question to those who have depressurised how cold did it get in the cabin....will it go down closer to initial cruise altitude temperature (especially with adiabatic cooling) or somewhere between cruise altitude temperature and the 10,000' temperature?
Just tried it in the sim at 36,000' and Boeing predicted 1,900 feet per minute rate of climb. Obviously it will vary with altitude / differential pressure / aircraft type /age and build quality. Pirate Pete what aircraft type took 30 minutes to loose pressure.
RMC is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2018, 09:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Germany
Age: 47
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well, i see nobody of you talks actual experience because anybody of you misses the most important: without any bleed air source the door sealings will not be inflated anymore resulting in significant pressure loss inside the cabin . this is not a question how old the aircraft is.

regards
aerobat77 is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2018, 11:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only aircraft I have worked on that had inflatable door seals was Gulfstream, I'm sure there are probably more out there but not to many, especially commercial pax/cargo types.
Exup is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2018, 11:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: UK / FIN
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Exup
Only aircraft I have worked on that had inflatable door seals was Gulfstream, I'm sure there are probably more out there but not to many, especially commercial pax/cargo types.
Think "aerobat77" meant normal door seals which usually have air passages to allow pressurized cabin air enter into seal, just to make them expand nicely against frame. Offcourse there is some types which have own pressure feed for seal, canīt remember how is it reacting if bleed air source is lost. Immediately if source is lost or just by slow leak. (Jetstream 41)
Corrosion is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2018, 13:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Mexico
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The acceptable leak rate for 737 is 100 secs from 4 PSID down to 2.5 PSID cabin pressure - on older airframes it can get difficult to achieve that.
Highway1 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2018, 04:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Corrosion
Fuselage belly drains, drain masts, some fuselage seams can leak littlebit, windscreens from seals, bad repairs with cherry max rivets if rivet center pin is missing.
How depressing is to find badly leaking aircraft on ground leak rate test... leaks from everywhere.
Older mechanics say they miss the bad old days when passengers smoked a lot of cigarettes -- leaks were easy to find; just look for the trail of nasty brown goo.
Gauges and Dials is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2018, 05:42
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: A place in the sun
Age: 82
Posts: 1,269
Received 48 Likes on 19 Posts
747-100 series UK CAA Certificate of Airworthiness Air Test pressurisation leak rate test, para 7.2.6. At 30,000ft, I quote:-

'With normal cabin diff. put GALLEY/LAV FAN ON and switch all A/C packs to OFF. Record leak rate over 1 minute; 750' maximum. Restore normal pressurisation.
Bergerie1 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2018, 04:07
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bergerie1
747-100 series UK CAA Certificate of Airworthiness Air Test pressurisation leak rate test, para 7.2.6. At 30,000ft, I quote:-

'With normal cabin diff. put GALLEY/LAV FAN ON and switch all A/C packs to OFF. Record leak rate over 1 minute; 750' maximum. Restore normal pressurisation.
Diff Eq time.

Let's say leak rate is linearly proportionate to the difference between cabin and outside altitude. And let's say at 30000 feet with normal cabin pressure, the cabin climbs at 750 feet per minute.

And let's say the evil genius who set up this word problem (We'll stipulate that he is Mr. Roberts, my calc teacher, may his kind soul rest in peace) has also told you that all O2 systems have failed.

What rate of descent do you need to achieve to prevent the cabin from ever getting above, say, 12,000 feet.

No fair using simulation. This has to have a closed form solution.
Gauges and Dials is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.