Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

RNAV Doubt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Feb 2018, 09:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Above the Horizon
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RNAV Doubt

Let's say a pilot is following an RNAV SID and then realises that the NAV Accuracy has degraded below the required. The ATC is informed Unable RNAV. If then ATC then gives a Direct To to a Waypoint can the pilot accept it?
Boyington is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2018, 12:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty poor day when you were but are now not able to maintain 1 mile nav accuracy.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2018, 13:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sunnydale
Posts: 252
Received 97 Likes on 44 Posts
If I was given direct to a way point that I could verify via raw data, I was above the MSA for the area and I could quickly tune the required beacon for the required way point (or I already had it hard tuned) then I would be happy to accept. However if I was in any doubt whatsoever I'd insist on at least a heading but preferably a heading and a climb above MSA.
back to Boeing is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.