Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Prop Tip Question

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Prop Tip Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th January 2018 | 22:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
From: NYC
Prop Tip Question

I was reviewing some interview questions and one question mentioned that C-130 prop tips are square and CP-140 prop tips are rounded. Why is that?
aviationluver is offline  
Reply
Old 7th January 2018 | 23:30
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 953
From: Aus
Page 116 may answer your question, at least in part.

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/776998.pdf

A better question to have asked is why the CP-140 are rounded and the L-188 Electra, ostensibly the same airframe, had square.
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 8th January 2018 | 06:35
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 189
From: Dorset UK
megan,
Not all Electras had the Aero Products square tipped props, some had Hamilton Standard with rounded tips like the C130 and P3.
I believe the HS props made the Electra about 10 Kts faster in the cruise.

As to why the difference, the reason is probably lost in the mists of time.
dixi188 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th January 2018 | 06:47
  #4 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 79
From: Denver
According to:

https://www.airspacemag.com/need-to-...ter-108981404/

...square tips are more effective per radius - up to the point (airspeed + tip speed) where they develop "compressibility burble" sooner than rounded/elliptical tips.

C-130 is slower, and needs the extra prop "push" on takeoffs, from the square planform. CP-140 has a higher cruise speed (405 kt vs. 330 kt) where the burble is more of a problem.

As to the Electra - I see a (very) few pictures of them with rounded prop tips. Probably just one of those "Oh, why didn't we think of that" changes made over time, and as the airframe was updated (e.g. CP-140) over decades.

http://imgproc.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!/photos/...4834.jpg?v=v40
pattern_is_full is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2018 | 23:38
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 953
From: Aus
Not all Electras had the Aero Products square tipped props, some had Hamilton Standard with rounded tips like the C130 and P3
The only airline to use the Hamilton was KLM dixi, unless an operator changed following production.
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2018 | 06:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 216
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Collins, Colorado USA
I believe American Flyers also used the Ham Standards with the rounded tips.
tonytales is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2018 | 15:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 336
Likes: 3
From: somewhere in the middle
Flew the Aeroproducts Electra for a short while, and jumpseated on both frequently.

By and large, the HS props worked better at lower levels, whereas Square props generally worked better above FL170 or so. But we are talking about 10-15kts at best.

Apparently the AP prop could get a more coarse blade angle, and a more “cruise” profile, but that’s just anecdotal.
thetimesreader84 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2018 | 18:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Scandinavia
Considering that the blade is effectively a wing that rotates, the rounded tip might induce less drag than the square blade, at hight relative angle of incidence that is. On the other hand the square tip gives more blade area for the given span. It would all depend on the nominal angle of attack the blade, I suppose.
Will Co is offline  
Reply
Old 17th January 2018 | 04:15
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 953
From: Aus
I believe American Flyers also used the Ham Standards with the rounded tips
tony, you prove the old saying, "Don't believe anything you read and only half of what you see". The KLM info came out of a Lockheed document. Seems American Flyer had a mixed fleet going by photos.
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 17th January 2018 | 08:43
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 489
From: A place in the sun
BOAC's Bristol Britannia 102 aircraft had square tipped propellers whereas those on the 312 had round tips. Why the difference between the two types when the only main difference was the size and range of the two types? Was it something to do with the engines?
Bergerie1 is online now  
Reply
Old 18th January 2018 | 02:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 216
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Collins, Colorado USA
The early Britannia's had hollow steel square tipped DH props related to the Ham Standards square tipped hollow steel props on the B377 Stratocruiser. Like the Boeing, the Brits were superseded by round tipped solid aluminum blades due to many problems with the hollow steel blades.
tonytales is offline  
Reply
Old 18th January 2018 | 04:10
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 953
From: Aus
problems with the hollow steel blades
Given the prior poor performance maintenance wise with hollow props, on the L-188 the Aero was a hollow steel forging and the Hamilton solid dural.
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 18th January 2018 | 08:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 489
From: A place in the sun
tonytales,

Thank you, I knew someone would have the answer!
Bergerie1 is online now  
Reply
Old 18th January 2018 | 18:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 216
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Collins, Colorado USA
As a small thread drift, if Ham Standard hollow steel props had problems, you should have seen the Ham Standard hollow dural blades on the Lockheed L-1649. Heard a crowd outside our maintenance office at the JFK IAB. An Air France L-1649 had parked outside our door. L-1649 had slower turning props than the L-1049's and so had wider chord prop blades which, to save weight, were new type hollow aluminum.
The Nbr. 3 prop had one blade that had split open down the leading edge. Some internal foam stuffing was sticking out. Pretty quickly the hollow dural blades were replaced by solid dural blades.
Hollow steel blades were a specialty of Curtiss Electric props and Aeroproducts as pointed out. From a line maintenance point of view the blades caused us little trouble.
tonytales is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.