Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

How does landing with slight positive pressure ensures structural integrity?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

How does landing with slight positive pressure ensures structural integrity?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Sep 2017, 11:22
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft certified for high elevation operations normally have an override of some kind or a procedure (old aircraft) to deal with the high cabin altitudes. Typically on a modern aircraft the cabin alt warnings are re-set to higher altitudes based on landing field elevation and the pax oxygen dropout shouldn't be effected as it's usually above 14500' cabin alt. The cabin pressure is still scheduled to LFE -2 to 300' on touchdown then a gradual depressurisation during the landing rollout.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2017, 05:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by underfire
Jet II,

Thanks for this...I was always wondering how the cabin pressure would be regulated when going to high alt airports. Typical cabin pressure is meant to be from 6000 (B787) to 8000 (others) feet.
You get to Cuzco (10,800) or Lizha, (11,700) and levels on approach to 200' above field level... (with cabin warnings at 8000') All good for airports less than the respective pressures...but. My brain hurtz.. Thank goodness for the automation, because if that ever gives up and one has to adjust this manually....damn.

They had oxygen bottles everywhere (and coca leaves) but nothing on the flightdeck.

Back to OP. It is not a structural issue, in fact, the structure would be far better off without the stress associated with overpressurization
You could add to the last sentence " in fact, would be much better off structurally without any "pressurize-depressuize" cycles.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2017, 07:13
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in fact, would be much better off structurally without any "pressurize-depressuize" cycles.
It would have been much better for Vanguard (VC9) G-APEC
Goldenrivett is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.