ACN vs PCN
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ACN vs PCN
Hi guys,
One airline I know is about to start long range ops from a regional airport. They operate a 787-8 which has MTOW ACN of 71, for the pavement in question (and they're gonna need to be close to MTOW for this flight)
However, the runway in question has PCN of 52, which is waay lower then the ACN.
How is this ops possible? My Jeppesen legend/explanation chapter says the PCN can be occasionally exceeded by 5 percent. In the above case we are talking about 35 percent overload...
One airline I know is about to start long range ops from a regional airport. They operate a 787-8 which has MTOW ACN of 71, for the pavement in question (and they're gonna need to be close to MTOW for this flight)
However, the runway in question has PCN of 52, which is waay lower then the ACN.
How is this ops possible? My Jeppesen legend/explanation chapter says the PCN can be occasionally exceeded by 5 percent. In the above case we are talking about 35 percent overload...
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PCN is mostly about long-term "wear and tear" (economics).
An airline willing to pay $$$ to cover the additional wear and tear / extra maintenance can easily get a waiver from many airports.
The airport wants the airline's business, after all.
An airline willing to pay $$$ to cover the additional wear and tear / extra maintenance can easily get a waiver from many airports.
The airport wants the airline's business, after all.
Last edited by peekay4; 14th May 2017 at 22:37.
Moderator
If you run a search on PCN and ACN and the poster Overrun you should come up with a few threads on this subject. Overrun is an engineering expert on pavements.
For example, http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/42840...?highlight=pcn
For example, http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/42840...?highlight=pcn
