Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus guarded switches colour

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus guarded switches colour

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th April 2017 | 04:02
  #1 (permalink)  
PGA
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Airbus guarded switches colour

Hi,

Does anybody know why some guarded switches on the Airbus or red while others are black? A possible reference would be appreciated!

Thanks!
PGA is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2017 | 07:55
  #2 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
The red ones provide for non-reversible actions.

I just made that up, yet strongly believe that it the case. No reference
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2017 | 08:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: just behind you....
Red- Action on this switch is irreversible.
Black- Action on this switch is reversible.

E. Mach is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2017 | 13:07
  #4 (permalink)  
PGA
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Thats what me and my colleague came up with as well...

However on the 380 the AC ESS override is guarded red but reversible...
Equally you can stop fuel jettison, so even though close it's not conclusive...

Appreciate the input!
PGA is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2017 | 18:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Middle East
for the A320, FCTM OP 040 ECAM HANDLING:

"in general, all guarded switches must be xchecked by pf & pm (except on grd) to prevent the flight crew from performing irreversible actions"

however, they don't say anything about the colours.

i will tend to agree with emach: Red- Action on this switch is irreversible. Black- Action on this switch is reversible.

Last edited by Feather44; 4th April 2017 at 18:35.
Feather44 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2017 | 19:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Costa del Surrey
Originally Posted by PGA
Equally you can stop fuel jettison, so even though close it's not conclusive...
True...but you can't get the fuel back.
JRK110 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2017 | 22:07
  #7 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
I was just going to say that.
NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2017 | 22:13
  #8 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 562
From: Washington.
"Red" is required by regulation for emergency controls, i.e., controls used only for emergency procedures. see 25.1555
GlobalNav is offline  
Reply
Old 6th April 2017 | 19:52
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Worldwide
For what it's worth, the FCTM for the A350 sheds a little light on the Airbus Guarded Switch philosophy:

"...The flight crew must crosscheck the above-listed controls, in order to prevent any inadvertent action by the flight crew with irreversible effects (i.e. when the flight crew operates red guarded controls). If the flight crew inadvertently operates a black guarded control, the subsequent effect is reversible."

This is from A350 FCTM, AOP-30, "HANDLING OF COCKPIT CONTROLS".

Effectively, on the A350 anyway, the red guarded switched are irreversible, black guarded are reversible.

This obviously isn't necessarily applicable to all airbus aircraft, but it certainly gives some insight into the general Guarded Switch philosophy, and does appear to hold up for the A330.
ESCAT is offline  
Reply
Old 10th April 2017 | 05:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Europe
I was told during ground school that the black guarded switches are more related with maintenance action whereas the red ones are to be controlled during flight in abnormal and emergencies.
EZMunk is offline  
Reply
Old 10th April 2017 | 18:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 1
From: Asia
Red can't be reversed, such as RAT deployment. Black, you need to be sure of such as MAN engine start or EVAC command.
Metro man is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2017 | 13:25
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 1
From: FinalApproach
Originally Posted by ESCAT
This obviously isn't necessarily applicable to all airbus aircraft, but it certainly gives some insight into the general Guarded Switch philosophy, and does appear to hold up for the A330.
It now holds for all Airbuses A320 including
Mgggpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2017 | 14:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 1
From: Sunrise Senior Living
I was told that the Eng and APU Fire Pbs were reversible. They are in the sim - without a "Systems Reset". There is nothing to that effect in the FCOM (unless you know differently) and one would have to be in a lot of trouble to even consider relighting a damaged engine.
Does anyone have any information which might confirm or contradict this assertion?
mcdhu is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2017 | 15:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 720
Likes: 1
From: N5109.2W10.5
Hi mcdhu,

I can't find the official incident report of BA 9 24 June 1982 but from memory and confirmed by wikipedia, No 4 engine failed first and the Fire Engine Checklist was completed as far as pulling the FCH and arming the bottles. After the remaining 3 engines had also failed (I guess that would count as "one would have to be in a lot of trouble to even consider relighting a damaged engine"), the first engine to be relit was No 4. Fortunately Flt Engineer Barry Townley-Freeman re-stowed the FCH (not in the QRH relight procedure) - so well done Barry.
Goldenrivett is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2017 | 15:12
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 4
From: Here and there
We have one A320 which has a High Altitude Landing pb and it has a Red guard.Obviously the switch has a reversible action.It reschedules the altitude at which Pax 02 deploys
tubby linton is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2017 | 18:17
  #16 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Mordor
I'd guess when you switch it OFF when in High Altitude envelope, you get 'rubber jungle' in the cabin. So it is kinda irreversible...
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2017 | 12:56
  #17 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 35
From: Oztrailia
On the A330 there are 2 red guarded switches that are reverseable.
Ditching PB and the AC essential feed PB.
ACMS is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd April 2017 | 10:07
  #18 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Tropics
Black guarded switches are reversible, red ones are not.

Reference is from the latest FCTM 22 march 2017.
dream747 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th June 2017 | 14:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Home
Red - Once pressed can be re-set only on ground !
Black - Once pressed can be re-set on air and some used for maintenance.
Skogafoss331 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th June 2017 | 23:20
  #20 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 422
Likes: 5
From: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
Originally Posted by ACMS
On the A330 there are 2 red guarded switches that are reverseable.
Ditching PB and the AC essential feed PB.
Ditching pb is black on the A320.

The reversible-non reversible philosophy seems to be valid for the A320
Escape Path is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.