Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus A32x FAC STD B0624

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus A32x FAC STD B0624

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th March 2017 | 04:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 387
Likes: 5
From: Australia
Airbus A32x FAC STD B0624

We have a new FAC standard on our aircraft which indicate that "alpha floor protection is inhibited when aircraft is above Mach 0.6" can anyone expand on why this was brought in?

It's B0624 apparently.

Cue Vilas?
Willie Nelson is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 06:08
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 775
Likes: 2
From: near EDDF
AI said:
"In this domain of high Mach, the availability of the protection is not relevant because the aircraft is in a situation of high energy."
IFixPlanes is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 06:33
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 102
From: IRS NAV ONLY
Perhaps to eliminate the "Abnormal Valpha Prot" OEB, where the protections try to kill you?
FlyingStone is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 08:17
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 387
Likes: 5
From: Australia
I was thinking along the same lines but there are circumstances when wouldn't eliminate and perhaps that's why it's still there also.
Willie Nelson is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 09:45
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 39
From: Wanderlust
May be to bring similarity with A330. In A330 alpha floor is inhibited beyond M.53. Valphaprot is different from alpha floor. Alpha floor is triggered at higher AOA than Valphaprot. This inhibition won't eliminate the OEB.

Last edited by vilas; 13th March 2017 at 10:04.
vilas is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 12:31
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 387
Likes: 5
From: Australia
That's right because there are two other conditions that will trigger it also.
Willie Nelson is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 13:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by IFixPlanes
AI said:
"In this domain of high Mach, the availability of the protection is not relevant because the aircraft is in a situation of high energy."
Yes. This is what Airbus says on the matter.
PilotJames is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 13:36
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 39
From: Wanderlust
Alpha floor or even Valpha protection basically was designed to pilot induced loss of speed situation during approach. They themselves realised that beyond .5M at altitude it meant nothing so they never had it in A330. So they seem to have knocked it off even in A320.
vilas is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.