FAP on RNP approaches
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay, I see this looks just like those other overlays the FAA was doing, what 5000 of them, to try to show some sort of progress.
Now there are RNAV/RNP to ILS procedures (which work so well in the box), yet another attempt by the FAA to claim NextGen progress?
I thought the meeting with Trump and the airlines was entertaining, I cant believe they let the cameras in there, and kept them going when the FAA was getting trashed. Great PR for the FAA and great information for the public to know.
Look for a separate FAA and ATO....
Now there are RNAV/RNP to ILS procedures (which work so well in the box), yet another attempt by the FAA to claim NextGen progress?
I thought the meeting with Trump and the airlines was entertaining, I cant believe they let the cameras in there, and kept them going when the FAA was getting trashed. Great PR for the FAA and great information for the public to know.
Look for a separate FAA and ATO....
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
of course, everyone has given up on any progress, such as GBAS, so the airlines have to run with what the FAA has the ability to approve, ie 1950's technology.
RNAV RNP turns to an ILS final, certainly not any disconnect in the FMS systems?
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
RNAV RNP turns to an ILS final, certainly not any disconnect in the FMS systems?
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
underfire:
It's been done for years: LNAV to ILS to LNAV missed approach. The only difference here are RF legs in the LNAV portion.
RNAV RNP turns to an ILS final, certainly not any disconnect in the FMS systems?