Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

E170/190 question

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

E170/190 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jan 2017, 06:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E170/190 question

Hi,

Does anyone know know why Embraer opted to leave conventional ailerons with FBW pitch and yaw controls?
Check Airman is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2017, 09:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 606
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
Cost and time to market. The ejet was their first large fbw airframe and they wrote the control law software in house.

The E2 is full fbw
Snakecharma is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2017, 22:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With any luck the ailerons will then work properly. These are the weak point on the current version. They are very powerful but at the same time probably the worst ailerons I've ever flown with. They have a binary feel: No aileron or some aileron and the spring that supplies the feel is as strong as hell. "Unharmonious" might be the best description.
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2017, 04:43
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info. It really is a strange little airplane.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2017, 05:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia the Awesome
Posts: 399
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Combined with the silly handlebars pivoting 6 inches below your hands really made it a bit odd, but it still lives in my memory as a lovely aeroplane.

Co incidentally it is 7 years ago today since I last flew one, hopefully all the software upgrades has made it even better.
Roj approved is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2017, 08:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The upgrades, depending on the package selected by your airline, have only really changed the reliability and function of subsystems, like bleed air, anti-icing logic, etc. The basic guts of flying is unchanged. So when you are hot and high descending FLCH, where are the power levers? You are stupid enough to use VNAV, so where and when will the aircraft pitch forward and overspeed you? I trust this aircraft little as I would a rabid dog. And that is after eight years.
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2017, 08:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check Airman - It might be strange but it's cheap and it does perform. It doesn't use much runway, either landing or taking off. It climbs well and is economical to operate. It also provides a reasonable interior for the passengers. But never let marketing people or bean counters decide the internal fit. They'll choose the wrong lockers, rip out wardrobes, stick in small galleys and install extra seats; then have the cheek to ask why you can't do a quick turnaround and why you can't stow all the hand-baggage. I love explaining...
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2017, 10:04
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks PM,

It's certainly an improvement over their last disaster- but from a pilot's perspective, doesn't seem quite ready for prime time yet. It pays the bills for now though.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2017, 11:24
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was only on the -170/175 for 15 months, but loved flying it.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2017, 15:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1500 sold.
Can't be that bad.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2017, 00:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By that logic, the 737 should then be described as "amazing" or "revolutionary" lol
Check Airman is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2017, 02:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Lossy city
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Passengers also seem to love the aircraft. Better seats than a 737, WAY more comfortable than the other regional jets (and proper overhead storage to boot). In the US they have proportionally more first class seats in the -175 (yay scope clauses), and in Europe at least BA have a low density plane meaning plenty of legroom (to minimise FA count).
triploss is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2017, 02:23
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Check Airman
By that logic, the 737 should then be described as "amazing" or "revolutionary" lol
I've certainly heard it described as amazing.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2017, 14:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly was both at it's launch.
FE Hoppy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.