Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

E170/190 question

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

E170/190 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th January 2017 | 06:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 136
From: USA
E170/190 question

Hi,

Does anyone know know why Embraer opted to leave conventional ailerons with FBW pitch and yaw controls?
Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2017 | 09:50
  #2 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 678
Likes: 71
From: Adelaide
Cost and time to market. The ejet was their first large fbw airframe and they wrote the control law software in house.

The E2 is full fbw
Snakecharma is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2017 | 22:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3
Likes: 5
From: Wor Yerm
With any luck the ailerons will then work properly. These are the weak point on the current version. They are very powerful but at the same time probably the worst ailerons I've ever flown with. They have a binary feel: No aileron or some aileron and the spring that supplies the feel is as strong as hell. "Unharmonious" might be the best description.
Piltdown Man is offline  
Reply
Old 29th January 2017 | 04:43
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 136
From: USA
Thanks for the info. It really is a strange little airplane.
Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 29th January 2017 | 05:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Australia the Awesome
Combined with the silly handlebars pivoting 6 inches below your hands really made it a bit odd, but it still lives in my memory as a lovely aeroplane.

Co incidentally it is 7 years ago today since I last flew one, hopefully all the software upgrades has made it even better.
Roj approved is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2017 | 08:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3
Likes: 5
From: Wor Yerm
The upgrades, depending on the package selected by your airline, have only really changed the reliability and function of subsystems, like bleed air, anti-icing logic, etc. The basic guts of flying is unchanged. So when you are hot and high descending FLCH, where are the power levers? You are stupid enough to use VNAV, so where and when will the aircraft pitch forward and overspeed you? I trust this aircraft little as I would a rabid dog. And that is after eight years.
Piltdown Man is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2017 | 08:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3
Likes: 5
From: Wor Yerm
Check Airman - It might be strange but it's cheap and it does perform. It doesn't use much runway, either landing or taking off. It climbs well and is economical to operate. It also provides a reasonable interior for the passengers. But never let marketing people or bean counters decide the internal fit. They'll choose the wrong lockers, rip out wardrobes, stick in small galleys and install extra seats; then have the cheek to ask why you can't do a quick turnaround and why you can't stow all the hand-baggage. I love explaining...
Piltdown Man is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2017 | 10:04
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 136
From: USA
Thanks PM,

It's certainly an improvement over their last disaster- but from a pilot's perspective, doesn't seem quite ready for prime time yet. It pays the bills for now though.
Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2017 | 11:24
  #9 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 71
From: Village of Santo Poco
I was only on the -170/175 for 15 months, but loved flying it.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2017 | 15:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
1500 sold.
Can't be that bad.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2017 | 00:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 136
From: USA
By that logic, the 737 should then be described as "amazing" or "revolutionary" lol
Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2017 | 02:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Lossy city
Passengers also seem to love the aircraft. Better seats than a 737, WAY more comfortable than the other regional jets (and proper overhead storage to boot). In the US they have proportionally more first class seats in the -175 (yay scope clauses), and in Europe at least BA have a low density plane meaning plenty of legroom (to minimise FA count).
triploss is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2017 | 02:23
  #13 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 71
From: Village of Santo Poco
Originally Posted by Check Airman
By that logic, the 737 should then be described as "amazing" or "revolutionary" lol
I've certainly heard it described as amazing.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2017 | 14:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
Certainly was both at it's launch.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.