Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

In-Ear aviation headset 2016

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

In-Ear aviation headset 2016

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th December 2016 | 09:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: CarrotLand
In-Ear aviation headset 2016

Hello guys,
after using Senn's HMEC 26 for few years, i now want to ty something different and lighter like in-ear headsets

I was decided to go for the Phonak 7100, but I later discovered that they are not TSO certified

After a bit of a research, i found that the only TSO certified in-ear headsets are the Clarity Aloft PRO and PRO Plus, is this correct?

I would use those i an A320 and they MUST be certified C139, C57 or have an EASA 1 form

Thanks in advance for your help
Tiennetti is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2016 | 23:56
  #2 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 261
Likes: 42
From: Europe
I've been thinking about getting the Phonak as well. Tried the 7000 last year, worked really well, even with generic ear plugs. Similar noise attenuation in the turboprop I flew back then as my Lightspeed Zulu2, but couldn't justify the expense back then.

Not helpful since you are looking for alternatives, but I'd also be interested to see if there are any other lesser known options besides Clarity Aloft. Their solution looks a bit less comfortable to me.
Intrance is offline  
Reply
Old 9th December 2016 | 10:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: The Heart
I use the Nanocomm. Excellent commfort, quality and price.

NanoComm GA - Ultra-Lightweight, Custom-Made Aviation Headset From Puretone

You shouldn't be worried about TSO approval. I found a document online which explained that a headset is a positive benefit to safety and would not be required to be TSO certified.
The reason I found it is because the aircraft I fly specifies the types of headsets which are approved. I didn't want to buy one I couldn't justify and the article satisfied this doubt.

Your headset should exceed the TSO which is a minimum standard.

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...rpretation.pdf

Further googling will produce more documents.
Miserlou is offline  
Reply
Old 9th December 2016 | 10:31
  #4 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 261
Likes: 42
From: Europe
@TangoAlphad; I can't really scientifically state yes or no, but in my experience it was perhaps slightly less effective, but not disturbingly so. If I would have switched back then I don't think I would have regretted it. I flew a BAe Jetstream 32 at that time. I was lucky to be able to try it out though, you might want to check if you have any reseller nearby that could let you try it.
Intrance is offline  
Reply
Old 9th December 2016 | 10:32
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: None
I also can vouch for the Nanocomm GA but in an Airbus environment. Very comfortable even for long flights.
Foniac is offline  
Reply
Old 9th December 2016 | 10:48
  #6 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 261
Likes: 42
From: Europe
Just had a look at the Nanocomm... Seems very interesting and a hell of a lot cheaper than the Phonak .
Intrance is offline  
Reply
Old 11th December 2016 | 08:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: unknown
How would you rate both the Clarity Aloft and the Nanocomm (which I didn't know and look very interesting...) for general aviation, non pressurized, single engine piston ops?
Sino is offline  
Reply
Old 7th April 2017 | 11:02
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: CarrotLand
Originally Posted by Miserlou
I use the Nanocomm. Excellent commfort, quality and price.

NanoComm GA - Ultra-Lightweight, Custom-Made Aviation Headset From Puretone

You shouldn't be worried about TSO approval. I found a document online which explained that a headset is a positive benefit to safety and would not be required to be TSO certified.
...
I can understand that, but i am not sure if my company would agree... as they specify that the headset must be TSO certified
Tiennetti is offline  
Reply
Old 7th April 2017 | 20:10
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 293
Likes: 9
From: Utterly insignificant little blue-green planet, unregarded yellow sun, unfashionable end, western spiral arm, Milky Way
A colleague and friend of mine swears by the Phonak FreeCom 7100. So much so that I am considering one myself. We're on the 737, using A20s today, and he claims he favours his Phonaks over even those.
semmern is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.