Ditching
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 451
Likes: 2
From: USA
B737900ER
Thanks.....Yes, I've done that.
Further question: 2182 KHz, as of 1 AUG 13, is no longer monitored by
the U.S. Coast Guard. However, is that frequency still monitored by the
rest of the world?
Anyone know?
Further question: 2182 KHz, as of 1 AUG 13, is no longer monitored by
the U.S. Coast Guard. However, is that frequency still monitored by the
rest of the world?
Anyone know?
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 1,191
From: 41S174E
I'll keep this one rolling along.
Why do Boeing suggest landing parallel to the swells on the windward side of the swell when you would have a lower impact speed if you just flew directly into wind?
Why do Boeing suggest landing parallel to the swells on the windward side of the swell when you would have a lower impact speed if you just flew directly into wind?
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,562
Likes: 952
From: Aus
Why do Boeing suggest landing parallel to the swells on the windward side of the swell
For a given wind the height of the wave is dependant upon the fetch. For a thirty knot wind the following fetch(nm)/wave height(ft) relationship applies
20/7.2
50/10.5
200/13.5
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 451
Likes: 2
From: USA
Politically Incorrect
Yes, I know, it's stupid.
Now, it's the Aeronautical Information Manual.
Regardless, I'm having to do a presentation about ditching. Trying to
do the best job I can, I'm trying to consult every source of information
I can find. This is why I'm asking PPrue for help. You guys (persons)
are always good for discussions, information, etc.
As I research this topic, I've found that, effective 1 AUG 13, the U.S.
Coast Guard no longer monitors 2182 KHz. However, 2182 (I thought)
is an international HF emergency frequency. So, is 2182 KHz still valid,
and only the Coast Guard no longer monitors this frequency, or is 2182
no longer an emergency frequency worldwide? (i.e. No one monitors it,
anymore.)
I'm sure someone on PPrune knows the answer to this..... You guys
(people) are sharp.
Now, it's the Aeronautical Information Manual.
Regardless, I'm having to do a presentation about ditching. Trying to
do the best job I can, I'm trying to consult every source of information
I can find. This is why I'm asking PPrue for help. You guys (persons)
are always good for discussions, information, etc.
As I research this topic, I've found that, effective 1 AUG 13, the U.S.
Coast Guard no longer monitors 2182 KHz. However, 2182 (I thought)
is an international HF emergency frequency. So, is 2182 KHz still valid,
and only the Coast Guard no longer monitors this frequency, or is 2182
no longer an emergency frequency worldwide? (i.e. No one monitors it,
anymore.)
I'm sure someone on PPrune knows the answer to this..... You guys
(people) are sharp.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: saint work
Its a marine ship frequency , most modern aircraft's have the 406 frq nowadays, and its all satellite supported. If you insist on knowing why they terminated the 2182 at the coast guard, then a us coast guard might be helpful.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: UK
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA
Why do Boeing suggest landing parallel to the swells on the windward side of the swell when you would have a lower impact speed if you just flew directly into wind?
As a side note, who carries a seat belt knife.....
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,688
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Wanaka
First off I need to establish that I have several thousand hours of water flying under my belt in aircraft that put the hull into the water (not a float plane).
It us all about support points and the length of the hull. Think about a 10ft piece of timber moving over a 12inch pipe. The forward end will easily rotate downwards into the ground. In an aircraft on a single wave as pitch control reduces the same can happen with the nose getting buried in the wave in front causing extreme stresses and possible destruction. Now think about the same piece of timber over 3 or more 12 inch pipes. Much more stability. Experienced sea plane pilots assess the size of the waves, the period between them and the size if their aircraft {length of the hull) along with the strength of the wind and make an intelligent decision whether to land into wind and across the waves or parallel to the swell.
Unfortunately most pilots ditching don't have the relevant experience so the guidance in the pamphlets and documentation provided by manufacturers and CAA authorities is written in generic form. In my opinion it should be followed. The two points I would add to most of them though are
Speed really counts... Water is hard when you hit it fast.. minimum speed should be used but not do not stall onto the water.
If you know you will have to ditch and you can do it with power (fuel running out or your aircraft is burning) ditch with power. You have a better chance of picking your touch down point, minimizing the speed and controlling the touch down
It us all about support points and the length of the hull. Think about a 10ft piece of timber moving over a 12inch pipe. The forward end will easily rotate downwards into the ground. In an aircraft on a single wave as pitch control reduces the same can happen with the nose getting buried in the wave in front causing extreme stresses and possible destruction. Now think about the same piece of timber over 3 or more 12 inch pipes. Much more stability. Experienced sea plane pilots assess the size of the waves, the period between them and the size if their aircraft {length of the hull) along with the strength of the wind and make an intelligent decision whether to land into wind and across the waves or parallel to the swell.
Unfortunately most pilots ditching don't have the relevant experience so the guidance in the pamphlets and documentation provided by manufacturers and CAA authorities is written in generic form. In my opinion it should be followed. The two points I would add to most of them though are
Speed really counts... Water is hard when you hit it fast.. minimum speed should be used but not do not stall onto the water.
If you know you will have to ditch and you can do it with power (fuel running out or your aircraft is burning) ditch with power. You have a better chance of picking your touch down point, minimizing the speed and controlling the touch down
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 71
From: Village of Santo Poco
I used to carry a seat belt knife as well as a windshield hammer back in the days of my misspent youth in EMS.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 9
From: Australia
Next time you are in the simulator and the box ticking exercises are over ask the instructor if you can have a go at a simulated ditching - starting from 1000 ft and at night. Rate of descent no more than 200 fpm. VRef 40 (Boeing 737). All manual flying no autothrottle or FD.
Believe me it takes considerable instrument flying skill as you may not know exactly where the sea is. RA may not always be accurate in calm seas. Nor the barometric altitude depending on atmospheric pressure at your location. At no stage should you exceed 200 fpm and the nose attitude should be slightly nose high all the way down.
Guarantee you would go in like a dropped torpedo first time you try it in the simulator. Which is precisely why simulator practice is vital for this exercise.
Believe me it takes considerable instrument flying skill as you may not know exactly where the sea is. RA may not always be accurate in calm seas. Nor the barometric altitude depending on atmospheric pressure at your location. At no stage should you exceed 200 fpm and the nose attitude should be slightly nose high all the way down.
Guarantee you would go in like a dropped torpedo first time you try it in the simulator. Which is precisely why simulator practice is vital for this exercise.