Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Low vis takeoff on contaminated runways

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Low vis takeoff on contaminated runways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th September 2016 | 10:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: World
Low vis takeoff on contaminated runways

For the Bus and Boeing experts in this forum: Does anyone know what is the minimum allowed RVR when taking off from contaminated runways?

I have been searching everywhere and I don't find any sustained information about this. I heard some companies use 200m as the minimum RVR (which makes sense to me), but other than that I don't find anything written about this subject.
busav8r is offline  
Reply
Old 5th September 2016 | 10:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: In Space
They are two different things. My current operator can depart at 125m (if you meet the visual criteria) and only depart on braking action medium or better.
B737900er is offline  
Reply
Old 5th September 2016 | 12:28
  #3 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
There is no regulatory (EASA land) requirement, to increase any margins for LVTO such as TOGA thrust, flap setting, contamination or wind components.

Some operators do feel, perhaps based on their own experience, that it is prudent to make LVTO a more conservative, strictly standardized operation. Hence some additional requirements such as C/L only with PBRK=ON. Such approach is admirable, and some of the restrictions may even come from the manufacturer's suggested SOPs. CM1=PF perhaps.

Unless extremely clearly worded in the manuals and well explained, those additional requirements could become a source of confusion for line crews. Writing unambiguous manuals and explaining things to pilots are, both of them independently, forms of black art.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2016 | 10:57
  #4 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 86
From: England
Approvals for very low vis takeoff (<250m?) may be based on the availability and/or spacing of centreline lighting.
If the runway contamination reduces the lighting then a higher vis should be used.
PEI_3721 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.