Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Low vis takeoff on contaminated runways

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Low vis takeoff on contaminated runways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Sep 2016, 10:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: World
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low vis takeoff on contaminated runways

For the Bus and Boeing experts in this forum: Does anyone know what is the minimum allowed RVR when taking off from contaminated runways?

I have been searching everywhere and I don't find any sustained information about this. I heard some companies use 200m as the minimum RVR (which makes sense to me), but other than that I don't find anything written about this subject.
busav8r is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2016, 10:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are two different things. My current operator can depart at 125m (if you meet the visual criteria) and only depart on braking action medium or better.
B737900er is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2016, 12:28
  #3 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
There is no regulatory (EASA land) requirement, to increase any margins for LVTO such as TOGA thrust, flap setting, contamination or wind components.

Some operators do feel, perhaps based on their own experience, that it is prudent to make LVTO a more conservative, strictly standardized operation. Hence some additional requirements such as C/L only with PBRK=ON. Such approach is admirable, and some of the restrictions may even come from the manufacturer's suggested SOPs. CM1=PF perhaps.

Unless extremely clearly worded in the manuals and well explained, those additional requirements could become a source of confusion for line crews. Writing unambiguous manuals and explaining things to pilots are, both of them independently, forms of black art.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2016, 10:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Approvals for very low vis takeoff (<250m?) may be based on the availability and/or spacing of centreline lighting.
If the runway contamination reduces the lighting then a higher vis should be used.
PEI_3721 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.