Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Circling Calculations

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Circling Calculations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Aug 2016, 07:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Circling Calculations

Trying to create a workable spreadsheet for circling calculations.

So far this is what I've come up with.

Entries in yellow cells, calculations in blue cells.

Comments, questions, and suggestions are welcome.


[IMG][/IMG]

Last edited by Dadanawa; 3rd Sep 2016 at 18:15.
Dadanawa is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 10:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,792
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
Why?


... and you're too close to the runway. Should be about 1.5 to 1.7 nm abeam.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 10:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Distance from runway depends on turn-radius for given speed. As speed increases, turn-radius increases, and distance from runnway increases.

Why ?

Takes the guesswork out during a procdure that is not commonly flown.
Dadanawa is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 12:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Dadanawa,

You did bother to draw this circuit out before posting your maths - didn't you?

If the downwind heading is 281 degs and the wind is from 269 degs at 10 kts, why are you bothering to circle to land with a 10 kt tailwind on finals?

If the circling direction is Left hand circuit (/L) why are you turning Left (253)? You would then surely be turning Right to turn onto finals. (What we used to call a Right Hand Circuit).

If I was flying at 1500 ft agl I would fly from abeam THR to base turn for 45 secs in still air. Since I have a 10 kt headwind flying downwind, then I'd turn at 55 secs (not at 33).

I think you'll find you need a mental picture to fly circuits - not a list of numbers.

Last edited by Goldenrivett; 26th Aug 2016 at 13:23. Reason: extra text
Goldenrivett is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 12:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is some confusion. I think you mean left break and not circle left? Why 30 degrees offset? should be 45 degrees and 30 seconds.
vilas is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 13:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 3,040
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Circling is a visual procedure. More time with eyes outside and less looking at an app might be a step in the right direction.
donpizmeov is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 14:08
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes Vilas,


What I mean is a left turn to right downwind.


And yes, in this particular case there is a tailwind. (Just entered arbitrary figures)


Separate sheet for 45 degree break.


I'd say figures can be entered quickly once you get the ATIS. Might take 20 seconds.
Dadanawa is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 14:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,413
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
If you can't make this work in your head and translate it into a flight path in the plane, you need to reconsider your career choice. How are you going to use this spreadsheet on a rainy afternoon just below the clouds in a jet?

GF
galaxy flyer is online now  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 14:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At 1500ft do a normal circuit as in most aircrafts done at 2.5 nm downwind displacement. Japs do at 2nm. You don't need a spread sheet.





vilas is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 15:46
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Icao/Pans -ops we fly 4.2nm for 180kts or 5.28 at 205 knots.
B737900er is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 22:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reminds me of the situation in my company a while back when the PM noticed PF rummaging in his flight bag when downwind on a visual approach in manual flight with no hands on the controls. When challenged he stated he was looking for his calculator to work out timing from abeam the threshold before turning finals!
Matey is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2016, 01:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Moses Lake, WA
Age: 63
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the real world, the wind changes as the altitude changes when descending. These changes are sometimes quite significant. I find it works best to look out the window, and vary the bank angle and descent rate as required so the aircraft ends up where I want on short final.
khorton is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2016, 04:04
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
The primary instrument in a visual approach is the window.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2016, 04:33
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Upsate NY
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1) Doing a bit of math my help the beginner to understand the limitations and trade space available to when flying the maneuver. The FAA has taken a crack at this for no wind with for us when setting up the A-E category minimums. These have recently been revised as they were a bit optimistic about what could be accomplished safely.


2) As a GA pilot who fly's a bit of IFR into small airport, I have performed as many real (IFR and not training) circle to land as I have real ILS approaches.
harpf is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2016, 07:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Hill? What hill?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2016, 08:14
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737900er
Icao/Pans -ops we fly 4.2nm for 180kts or 5.28 at 205 knots.
Really? I think you have misunderstood the PANS OPS. It gives the limit of visual manoeuvring area available. Why would you place yourself at the edge of the area? Even if you did turn downwind at 205kts it will place you 2.34nm on downwind.
vilas is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2016, 11:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vilas

Sorry, I didnt make myself clear there what I meant is those are the limits we fly to. As you said rightly said, you would be well within those limits.

Timing 3seconds per 100' Agl +\- wind
B737900er is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2016, 12:07
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sky
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is not +\- wind correction for circling approach in according to Airbus documents.
There was the thread here regarding this correction
Safe flights
avoka is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2016, 12:33
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is not +\- wind correction for circling approach in according to Airbus documents.
Can somebody please explain how the physics of ground speed changes if the only difference is that some aircraft now have a computer between the pilot and the control surfaces.
Goldenrivett is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2016, 19:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
avoka
There is no such document by airbus. You can read your FCOM the timing is very much there.Also read the thread again fully.
vilas is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.