Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Radio Altimeter question

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Radio Altimeter question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th May 2016, 19:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was in a meeting about ten years ago where the head of the Joint OEB told the manufacturer to go away and take his manuals with him and don't come back until they were amended to Radio Altimeter.

They were Honeywell units ;-)
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 00:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 606
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
Talk about pole vaulting over mouse ****!

Who gives a flying crap whether they are called radar altimeters or radio altimeters!

And I thought I was a pedant.
Snakecharma is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 00:45
  #23 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snakecharma:

Who gives a flying crap whether they are called radar altimeters or radio altimeters!
RA means both except for the exceptionally anal retentive folks in this business.
aterpster is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 03:08
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 606
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
Aterpster, that's what I would have thought. I was amazed that the discussion about the "correct" nomenclature took place at all, let alone grew the legs that it seemed to.

Maybe I am just getting old
Snakecharma is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 04:44
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,951
Received 397 Likes on 210 Posts
I was amazed that the discussion about the pedant conversation took place at all, let alone grew the legs that it seemed to. And I am old.
megan is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 07:02
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chu chu
A wide cone doesn't seem like it would normally be a problem
I understand your point, but if the cone is too wide, it will start reflecting your own landing gear or low slung engines.
If I remember correctly, the Rad Alts on the 747SP were only a few feet behind the gear.
NSEU is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 08:33
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In aircraft that use Radalt for height holding, the signal is smoothed to avoid bumps causing aggressive height changes.
Tourist is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.