RA callout on 744
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Moscow, Russian Fed.
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RA callout on 744
Are BA the only -400 operator that have the automated 2500' RA callout?
Does this extend to the entire BA Boeing EFIS fleet?
toodly doo
Does this extend to the entire BA Boeing EFIS fleet?
toodly doo
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Moscow, Russian Fed.
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
personally I think its an excellent option to enable. might seem trivial to many but definitely enhances situational awareness on finals... I don't think many operators enable it (in the Sim configs I have flown - very few..)
Guest
Posts: n/a
"This just involves grounding out certain pins on the back of the avionic shelf. It takes about an hour to do, quite simple in fact. "
You may find that some callouts cannot be simply pin-programmed. I've heard some callouts in different accents. BA's 744's used to have "Radio Altimeter" voiced at 2,500' in a very "British" female accent. If I recall correctly, Cathay had a rather unique 60' callout (which may have been critical during those old Kai Tek(Tak) approaches) which had a slight Chinese accent. Some EGPWS announcements sound as if they are spoken by a New Zealander (EGPWS systems, of course, require quite a bit of hardware/software modification).
Regards.
Q.
You may find that some callouts cannot be simply pin-programmed. I've heard some callouts in different accents. BA's 744's used to have "Radio Altimeter" voiced at 2,500' in a very "British" female accent. If I recall correctly, Cathay had a rather unique 60' callout (which may have been critical during those old Kai Tek(Tak) approaches) which had a slight Chinese accent. Some EGPWS announcements sound as if they are spoken by a New Zealander (EGPWS systems, of course, require quite a bit of hardware/software modification).
Regards.
Q.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flat Spin...
It is not dependant on config as far as I know... which since one of the "functions" of the call out would be to alert you to advancing ground, a bit silly if imhibited because you forgot to configure, or were simply below MSA and descending unaware. Certainly not gear dependant, because unlikely to be down at this point.
It provides a good check that you have the correct QNH set, when relating it to airfield elevation, often in advance of any fix glidepath checks - although adjustment needs to be allowed for if terrain fluctautates between this ~8NM point and the af. Our SOPs actually require a verbal confirmation that the callout is at a sensible point when related to the servo alts.
There must be some software (as in the GPWS) to avoid nuisance calls for aircraft in the hold etc. - I frequently see the RAlt read here, but can't recall hearing the voice.
NoD
It is not dependant on config as far as I know... which since one of the "functions" of the call out would be to alert you to advancing ground, a bit silly if imhibited because you forgot to configure, or were simply below MSA and descending unaware. Certainly not gear dependant, because unlikely to be down at this point.
It provides a good check that you have the correct QNH set, when relating it to airfield elevation, often in advance of any fix glidepath checks - although adjustment needs to be allowed for if terrain fluctautates between this ~8NM point and the af. Our SOPs actually require a verbal confirmation that the callout is at a sensible point when related to the servo alts.
There must be some software (as in the GPWS) to avoid nuisance calls for aircraft in the hold etc. - I frequently see the RAlt read here, but can't recall hearing the voice.
NoD
