Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

RNP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2016, 12:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Shannon
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RNP

Hi guys,

Im sorry the following question may sound stupid, but English is not my native language and I just cant get my head around the following sentence find on a lot of GNSS approaches.

"Uncompensated BARO VNAV NA below -10°c"

How to interpret this?

Thanks
FR9999 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2016, 20:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It means you cannot use the procedure if the temperature is below 10°C

As temperature is dropping, the actual altitude vs reported altitude is dropping.

For non comp baro, you will be lower on the glideslope, thus losing the obstacle clearance. http://code7700.com/altimeter_temper...orrection.html

underfire is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2016, 22:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It means that, if the temperature is below the published minimum and you are operating in an aircraft with an uncompensated system (B737 is one), then you cannot operate to the published VNAV minima (LNAV/VNAV minima on a Jeppesen chart.) You can still fly the procedure, but to LNAV minima only, and with appropriate cold temperature corrections applied. The corrections will reinstate the aircraft at the correct true barometric altitude (3500 in underfire's example above), whilst actually reading a higher indicated altitude on your altimeter.
Matey is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 16:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Uncompensated BARO VNAV NA below -10°c"
NA = Not Authorised
oggers is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 16:23
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Shannon
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you guys for your time. I really do appreciate it. So as I understand, you dont have to apply a temperature correction to this LNAV/VNAV minima in this case?
FR9999 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 22:55
  #6 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
VNAV is driven by the machine, being out of temperature envelope legally precludes you from using it. Therefore the VNAV/LNAV minima are N/A too.

One would fly plain LNAV approach i.a.w. the DIST/ALT table, having applied the temp correction to the declared values. Down to plain LNAV minima that need to be corrected upwards too! See Matey above.

my 2c, FD.

Last edited by FlightDetent; 20th Jan 2016 at 23:43. Reason: forgot to correct the minima
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 23:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FR9999, you do have to apply temperature correction to the minima. It is the pilot's responsibility to make a temperature correction whenever it is 'very cold'. 'Very cold' translates to an airfield temperature of <0°C generally, or for the US a temperature published on the plate for certain airports. The temperature correction to procedure minima applies to all procedures including those made using compensated Baro VNAV.

The webpage that underfire linked to offers a good explanation and references for all of this.
oggers is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.