Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Nitrogen in tyres

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Nitrogen in tyres

Old 16th Jan 2016, 18:27
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,080
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Sure. A gentle, sustained flow of air works wonders. A sudden blast will either cause a brief flare-up or blow the flame out altogether.
Chu Chu is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2016, 21:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the Old Folks' Home
Posts: 420
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
U.S. Navy Rationale

Back in the dark ages 40 years ago when I was flying off carriers, tire pressures were usually 400 psi for carrier operations and 300 psi for field operations. Those high pressures exerted a lot of stress on the tire especially during carrier landings. Navy pilots were taught that inflating tires with an inert gas precluded oxygen under pressure reacting with the rubber and weakening it.
Smilin_Ed is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2016, 19:08
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think the accident that started the change was a DC8 in Saudi i think which had a wheel well fire and the tyres exploded leading to loss of the aircraft , sure someone else will have the relevant details
bvcu is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2016, 01:02
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FAR part 25.733(e):
"(e) For an airplane with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of more than 75,000 pounds, tires mounted on braked wheels must be inflated with dry nitrogen or other gases shown to be inert so that the gas mixture in the tire does not contain oxygen in excess of 5 percent by volume, unless it can be shown that the tire liner material will not produce a volatile gas when heated or that means are provided to prevent tire temperatures from reaching unsafe levels."

From Michelin Aircraft Tire Service Manual:
"NOTE: Michelin recommends that all tires, regardless of position or aircraft rating, be inflated with dry nitrogen of at least 97% purity. Some OEM (airframers) recommend 99.5% purity. When adding 97% pure nitrogen to an “empty” tire, the nitrogen concentration will end up about 95% when the pressure reaches about 125 psi. When the operating pressure is less than 125 psi and the desired concentration is ≥ 95% nitrogen by volume, use a double inflation process if the source nitrogen is 97% purity."

Consider the Space Shuttle tires:
"Like most aircraft tires, the Space Shuttle tires are filled with nitrogen because of its stability at different altitudes and temperatures. Due to the extremely heavy loads, these bias ply tires are inflated to 340 psi (main gear) and 300 psi (nose gear). The main landing gear shuttle tires are only used one time, and the nose landing gear tires are used for two landings."

Here what they looked like after one landing:



Last edited by riff_raff; 18th Jan 2016 at 01:15. Reason: More information
riff_raff is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 23:20
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kansas
Age: 85
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TURIN
Left hand threads on the O2 hose unions help. I've still seen it done though.
Left hand threads are used on inflammable gases, i.e. propane, acetylene.
Ozlander1 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2016, 09:19
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,489
Received 145 Likes on 81 Posts
Originally Posted by Ozlander1
Left hand threads are used on inflammable gases, i.e. propane, acetylene.
I didn't know that. Good job we don't have those hanging around on the ramp.
I don't think an oxygen/flammable gas combo would go down very well in the crew O2 system.
TURIN is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2016, 11:00
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason N2 is used in aircraft (and F1 and general cars) is the following:

1. Pure nitrogen is dry and does not absorb moisture. This helps with corrosion, but the main reason was that with air filled tyres and moisture collect at the bottom, froze in flight and created an imbalance when landing.

2. N2 molecules are larger than than O2, and so pressure loss is slower.

3. Its inert and wont contribute to a fire.
hoss183 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2016, 01:39
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,926
Received 391 Likes on 206 Posts
the main reason was that with air filled tyres and moisture collect at the bottom, froze in flight and created an imbalance when landing
Not the case at all hoss. The real reasons are in this document.

Federal Aviation Administration
megan is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2016, 03:44
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seriously recommend Nitrogen in Car tires, better fuel economy and less road noise

Here in NZ its cheap, and to get them checked and topped up when necessary is FREE!!!

Best Regards
timboeing707 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2016, 04:29
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nitrogen on passenger cars, for the most part, is just a scam:
peekay4 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2016, 04:56
  #31 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 99 Likes on 70 Posts
1. Pure nitrogen is dry and does not absorb moisture. This helps with corrosion, but the main reason was that with air filled tyres and moisture collect at the bottom, froze in flight and created an imbalance when landing.

You started so well, but......whilst we are never too old to learn, and despite my lifetime involvement as an engineer, I have never heard, or read, anything about wheels becoming inbalanced due to, erm, frozen water in the wheel hub.... 9/10 for creative thinking....1/10 for factual content. Do you, by any chance, have any documented evidence concerning aircraft wheel and tyre assemblies to support this please ?....because, having perused some excellent material from Mr Goodrich / Dunlop et al, I cannot find, or recall, any reference to this phenomenon.

2. N2 molecules are larger than than O2, and so pressure loss is slower.

Oh ?

3. Its inert and wont contribute to a fire

At last ! success !.....
Krystal n chips is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2016, 06:32
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,676
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
I was told by an automotive tyre guy that pressure loss with nitrogen is slightly less.

The molecule is larger than the oxygen molecule.

Rubber does a pretty good job at containing air/gas. At a molecular level, some gas very slowly leaks through the material. It might take several weeks for a pressure loss to become evident - maybe months - but it will gradually deflate.

The higher the inflation pressure, the greater/faster the loss.

Makes sense. However, at the end of the discussion, I opted for regular air. I don't mind recharging the tyres every few months when/if required.
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2016, 17:41
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 727-264 XA-MEM Las Mesas
barit1 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2016, 10:20
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blighty (Nth. Downs)
Age: 77
Posts: 2,107
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Lessons not always handed down...

Evidently there are a lot of young aviators contributing to this thread. And I wonder if the operative that serviced that B727's tyre with air in 1986 had ever read the following accident report. It was still fresh in aviation circles when I started flying:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swissair_Flight_306

And it has figured here (on AH&N) in 2010:

http://www.pprune.org/aviation-histo...ml#post5710327
Chris Scott is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 18:01
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Pacific
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Alaska we use nitrogen for all the reasons given here plus it is not as affected by the cold. If the tyre is inflated with compressed air and then flown to the Slope for example, the tyre pressure drops as the temperature drops and we have had tyres roll off the rims when taxiing. With nitrogen the pressure is more stable and since the change we have had no problems with tyres in cold conditions.
boofhead is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 18:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,395
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by boofhead
In Alaska we use nitrogen for all the reasons given here plus it is not as affected by the cold. If the tyre is inflated with compressed air and then flown to the Slope for example, the tyre pressure drops as the temperature drops and we have had tyres roll off the rims when taxiing. With nitrogen the pressure is more stable and since the change we have had no problems with tyres in cold conditions.
Nitrogen and dry air will respond exactly the same to changes in temperature - it's called the ideal gas law. The potential problem with compressed air is if it isn't dry and there is significant water vapor present. The change in state of vapor to liquid (or visa-verse) is the potential issue.

Bottled compressed air is normally dry (running it through some sort of dryer is part of the process) - as is bottled nitrogen. It's the air out of the shop compressor that may be a problem.
tdracer is online now  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 18:22
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed. I recall refilling a tyre at an OAT of -32C with shop compressed air. The tyre valve promptly froze with ice in the open position, releasing a large quantity of air, resulting in an even more under-inflated tyre.. Nitrogen has benefits for cold weather ops.
evansb is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 22:38
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nashville
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tdrace
"My gut feeling is that it's a myth (the molecular weight of N2 is lower than O2, so everything else being equal the N2 molecule would be slightly smaller than O2) but there could be some subtle way the molecule reacts with the rubber that makes it effectively larger. At any rate the difference would be in the mud"
As you'd expect, diffusion rate of O2 and N2 through various membranes has been studied for over a century, and is well understood.

Diffusion rate is defined by Fick's Law, and is dependent on the frictional coefficient of the molecule, not just its physical size. The frictional coefficient is based on (a) Stokes Radius (not physical diameter) of the molecule, and (b) The viscosity coefficient of the gas at the given pressure and temperature. I'm guessing that N2 has a greater frictional coefficient than O2, due to either greater viscosity and/or larger Stokes Radius than O2, and that probably explains the lower diffusion rate.

The equations to calculate these are complex, but it's not a myth. If any physics major is reading this, they could probably give more details.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fick%27s_law_of_diffusion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes_radius
joema is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2016, 00:59
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,080
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Last time there was a thread about this I found a U.S. Department of Transportation (I think) study on nitrogen on tires. My recollection is that it found that the nitrogen concentration in air-inflated tires increased slightly over time. But I don't think the study concluded whether this was due to oxygen diffusing from the tires more rapidly, or due to it's being "consumed" in oxidizing the tire walls.

In any event, the change in concentration was quite slight, meaning that if the oxygen was diffusing faster, it wasn't by much. And when you consider that air is only 20% oxygen to start with, a slight decrease in the diffusion rate for that 20% isn't going to make much difference in tire pressure.
Chu Chu is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2016, 12:50
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nashville
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chu Chu
"if the oxygen was diffusing faster, it wasn't by much. And when you consider that air is only 20% oxygen to start with, a slight decrease in the diffusion rate for that 20% isn't going to make much difference in tire pressure."
According to a 2009 NHTSA study, the inflation pressure loss for tires inflated with nitrogen was approximately two-thirds of the loss rate of tires inflated with air. They tested both static and in-use automotive tires.

"The Effects of Varying the Levels of Nitrogen in the Inflation Gas of Tires on Laboratory Test Performance" (4.6MB .pdf): http://tinyurl.com/jvcgfxo
joema is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.