Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

When do I have to turn to initial track during Turning SIDs


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

When do I have to turn to initial track during Turning SIDs

Old 7th December 2015 | 08:47
  #21 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,441
Likes: 306
From: various places .....
but in a country that uses U.S. TERPS

Not overly familiar with TERPS and would defer to you on PANS/OPS as well, in any case, good sir.

AEO planned turns are not commonplace but, sometimes - due to terrain - are necessary.

For instance, Hobart 30 (AUS) has an early turn to avoid tiger country. It used to be SOP to do this for all 30 departures as the OEI escape followed this procedure. I imagine the present operators still do the same as the payload penalties running straight out would be uneconomic ..
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2015 | 12:29
  #22 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 111
From: Somewhere over the rainbow
Hello,

The way we do it at Air Macau: We take off, we disregard the lateral guidance of the FD initially: As we cross 200 feet AGL, we start turning (max bank 15°) then at 400 feet we follow the FD to comply with the RNAV SID.

Some captains even climb to 400 feet first before starting the turn. Never heard a complain about that.. And there is no obstacle to worry about... Anyway unless you are heavy on a hot day, you are generally above 400'' before the DER, at least on A 320s.


Just for interest, according to our SOP we are not allowed to turn below 200 feet AGL and between 200 feet and 400 feet AGL, max 15° bank then 30° above 400 feet AGL.
pineteam is offline  
Reply
Old 16th December 2015 | 10:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 555
Likes: 2
From: South Island
For instance, Hobart 30 (AUS) has an early turn to avoid tiger country. It used to be SOP to do this for all 30 departures as the OEI escape followed this procedure. I imagine the present operators still do the same as the payload penalties running straight out would be uneconomic ..
Thread drift but I know at least one major operator runs straight out even in their OEI procedure. The pitt water departure requires VMC to 1000' but all the other SIDs remain on R-300.

To keep the splay inside of Mt Lord and the terrain there the V2 needs to be kept below about 155KTAS.

Back to the thread, if turns were not allowed below 400', then OEI most aircraft would have to go straight for quite some distance! On paper at least
glekichi is offline  
Reply
Old 16th December 2015 | 11:11
  #24 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 202
From: Here and there
Originally Posted by glekichi
Thread drift but I know at least one major operator runs straight out even in their OEI procedure. The pitt water departure requires VMC to 1000' but all the other SIDs remain on R-300.

To keep the splay inside of Mt Lord and the terrain there the V2 needs to be kept below about 155KTAS.

Back to the thread, if turns were not allowed below 400', then OEI most aircraft would have to go straight for quite some distance! On paper at least
Yes, we would not be the major operator you are referring to but our OEI procedure is straight up the ILS to the NDB.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.