Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Descent Angle and V/S


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Descent Angle and V/S

Old 20th September 2015 | 06:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Above the Horizon
Descent Angle and V/S

In the Jeppesen Approach charts, under the profile view the required vertical speed to remain on profile for the respective descent angle is mentioned. But for the same descent angle and ground speed the vertical speed mentioned sometimes varies.
For example in Kuwait for chart 18-1 with a descent angle of 3 degrees the V/S required is 637 for G/S of 120 kts but for Male Airport (VRMM) chart 11-1 with a descent angle of the same 3 degrees and GS of 120 kts the V/S required is 646
It beats logic. Can someone please explain?
Boyington is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2015 | 10:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 720
Likes: 1
From: N5109.2W10.5
It beats logic.
Neither is set exactly at 3 degrees.
There is 0.04 degree difference between them and they couldn't be bothered to publish the descent angle to the second decimal place.
Goldenrivett is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2015 | 20:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
I stand to be corrected, but Jeppeson is a publishing house of data sent to them by the individual Airports and their respective AIP's. They do not produce self-claculated data. Info told to me years ago????
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2015 | 21:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA
Rat,

As far as I am aware, Jepp does calculate the information. From errors noted from posts on this board, Jepp has recalculated and revised several plates.

In the procedure design world, we must validate the coding of the procedures and waypoints on the AIRAC cycle, and there are always waypoints and runways ends that are incorrect. Curved fligthpaths are always a negotiation.

In addition, there is quite a bit of the world where the AIP is not standardized to the standard datum. Jepp has to do the conversions for these datums.
underfire is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2015 | 22:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Sao Jose dos Campos-Brazil
I am still to see a pilot that can maintain precisely 646fpm instead of 637fpm...

But the discussion is valid...
Sydy is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.