Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Missed Approach Climb Gradient

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Missed Approach Climb Gradient

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th April 2015 | 20:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Vienna
Question Missed Approach Climb Gradient

Hey guys, I've been searching the forums for an answer to my question, but there doesn't seem to be a "definitive" answer available.

In AMC2 CAT.POL.A.225 it's written that:
"For instrument approaches with a missed approach climb gradient greater than 2.5%, the operator should verify that the expected landing mass of the aeroplane allows for a missed approach with a climb gradient equal to or greater than the applicable missed approach gradient in the OEI missed approach configuration and at the associated speed."

Also, from our OM-A it is stated that "The mass of the aircraft shall not exceed the mass which allows an one engine out missed approach (approach configuration) gradient of at least 2.5%, unless a higher gradient is required by the airworthiness requirements or by the published missed approach procedure for a specific runway."

I can't seem to find any reference as to whether these are GROSS or NET climb gradients? The only reference to a NET climb gradient I can find is for take-off climb gradients.

Sorry for the long post, and thanks in advance for your replies!
DarkMale327 is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2015 | 09:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: In Space
Its GROSS.
B737900er is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2015 | 11:20
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Vienna
Thank you!
DarkMale327 is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2015 | 13:05
  #4 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Scandinavia
Net vs Gross

From memory, Net performance of airplanes is factorized to give Gross performance meaning that Gross performance has a safety factor to account for the average pilot, flying the average airplane in the fleet on an average day.

Measured performance is that demonstrated by highly skilled test pilots (i.e. not me at least )

Last edited by MD80rookie; 5th April 2015 at 13:06. Reason: spelling
MD80rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2015 | 14:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Measured --> Factored ----> Gross ----> factored -----> Net

Good explanation here:

http://www.atpforum.eu/showpost.php?p=45922&postcount=2

Don't forget the visual baulked requirement too
VinRouge is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2015 | 20:28
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Vienna
Thanks for all the replies guys!
DarkMale327 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.