Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

F/D: Old Hat!

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

F/D: Old Hat!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd February 2015 | 06:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Wengen
F/D: Old Hat!

F/D is no more on the A330 MRTT and A400M.
Indeed, a certain Klopfstein, HUD Father, said it was useless.
Airbus then made a cut-down version when they launched the A320.
F/D is for rejects and now one must fly-by-the-bird.
Winnerhofer is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2015 | 09:39
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 35
From: Oztrailia
What are you on about???
ACMS is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2015 | 12:49
  #3 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Holding at DESDI
Really? When? How?
J.L.Seagull is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2015 | 15:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: france
The word "bird" is used for the HUD speed vektor indicator and inputs are then inertial.
Airbus tried to create illusion of HUD but the "bird" of the AF447 A330 was only a F/D variation and inputs came from the ADIRU alimented by airflow. It is why their "bird" disappeared as written in ACARS. Example of bad copy from the Viper by A...
The FBW Airbus' bird looks like, smells like, but is not HUD
roulishollandais is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2015 | 17:10
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Wengen
Air Force Airbuses

Straight from the horse's mouth from France's Air Force tester...and yes that panic button to go into Direct Law is real but ONLY for military purposes.
The idea is that in case of missile attack crews on the A330 MRTT and A400M can do aggresive avoidance manouvers which they are trained to do and not on the menu for civilian purposes.
Btw, the A330 MRTT has one other Law for air-to-air refuelling in case things get lopsided.
I always had suspected that the military Airbus had far more advanced software and is very different beast.
Winnerhofer is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2015 | 20:00
  #6 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Beyond ideas of right doing and wrongdoing
Source

Sailplaneflier is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2015 | 09:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
HUD incorporates a flight director so I've no idea what the OP is on about!
FE Hoppy is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.