A320 No Tail Antiicing
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vrsac
Age: 51
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A320 No Tail Antiicing
Hello experts,
What is the explanation on lack of tail anti / de icing on A320. i presume that horizontal tail is not impacted directly by supercooled droplets due to wing downwash, but what about the vertical tail leading edge?
Also I am wandering what are water drain outlets for - when is water draining through them? They are heated?
What is the explanation on lack of tail anti / de icing on A320. i presume that horizontal tail is not impacted directly by supercooled droplets due to wing downwash, but what about the vertical tail leading edge?
Also I am wandering what are water drain outlets for - when is water draining through them? They are heated?
Complies with the icing certification requirement for both maximum continuous and intermittent maximum icing conditions without deicing of these surfaces.
Not unusual for jet transports to have some surfaces or parts of surfaces without anti ice / deice fitted.
Not unusual for jet transports to have some surfaces or parts of surfaces without anti ice / deice fitted.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just because it isn't anti-iced does NOT mean it will be free of ice anyway.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vrsac
Age: 51
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I understood you well:
- Ice IS forming on LE of tailplanes and fin, but is not having large detrimental effect on aerodynamics ? How is this possible?
- Water is drained during flight (otherwise why heating) through the masts, from the sink.
- Ice IS forming on LE of tailplanes and fin, but is not having large detrimental effect on aerodynamics ? How is this possible?
- Water is drained during flight (otherwise why heating) through the masts, from the sink.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In practice you will indeed find the horizontal tail to be the most affected by ice accretion! When we have to de-ice on the ground after a flight through icing conditions it is usually due to the stabilizer being iced up, and not the unheated inner slats!
Icing certification requires demonstration in both cumulo cloud and strato cloud icing conditions. These conditions are defined by the liquid water content of the cloud and the water droplet size. Strato clouds are considered long term encounters, cumulo clouds to be intermittent encounters. There are exposure times defined in the certification requirements. This information enables the design office to calculate the shape of the ice accretion.
Flight test will be carried out to ensure the aircraft handling complies with certification standards with the critical ice shapes fitted to the non anti ice/deiced surfaces.
It can be a frustrating and time consuming exercise searching for "certification standard" clouds so simulated ice shapes may be used at times, but like airborne water spray rigs they don't replace exposure to natural icing for certification.
Of course there is much more to icing certification than the above.
Flight test will be carried out to ensure the aircraft handling complies with certification standards with the critical ice shapes fitted to the non anti ice/deiced surfaces.
It can be a frustrating and time consuming exercise searching for "certification standard" clouds so simulated ice shapes may be used at times, but like airborne water spray rigs they don't replace exposure to natural icing for certification.
Of course there is much more to icing certification than the above.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ice IS in fact affecting the aerodynamics. (Of course)
The aircraft has been designed to account for that. (Simplistically, the tail is over-sized to compensate for reduced effectiveness when ice forms; it's easier/cheaper/simpler to make the tail a bit bigger and take a weight penalty than to install a whole extra anti-icing system on the tail, which is why that's the typical approach for higher speed aircraft)
If so, can we change the thread title please?
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The list of aircraft WITHOUT tail anti-/de-icing is pretty long, I'm not sure we could list them all in a thread title. (I believe there's a character limit applicable to titles)
The original question was about the A320, the title seems valid to me.
The original question was about the A320, the title seems valid to me.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 80
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the last commercial aircraft I worked on that had tail plane de-icing was the HS Trident - none of the Boeings, L1011, or Airbus had it. The only reason I remember the Trident horizontal stab. De-icing is that the system incorporated a rubber flexible joint known to all and sundry as 'the Donkeys Dick'. Probably the most obscene looking aircraft component in history. The designer must have had a sense of humour.
